droidmonkey

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by droidmonkey 10mo ago

   Additionally, the original KeePass project has no public development or public review process for their code. They do everything behind the scenes and only publish code when a release is made. KeePass is "code available" open sour
2. 2.▲
   by droidmonkey 10mo ago

   Decades of programming and open source experience.
3. 3.▲
   by droidmonkey 10mo ago

   > From where does that confidence come? From decades of experience, quite honestly.
4. 4.▲
   by droidmonkey 10mo ago

   We did not create this process for AI, it has been our process since 2016.
5. 5.▲
   by droidmonkey 3y ago

   A blog post has been put up to address this: https://keepassxc.org/blog/2023-06-20-cve-202335866/ Additionally, this is certainly not unique to KeePassXC. KeePass original and other clones we have tested do not re
6. 6.▲
   by droidmonkey 3y ago

   Hi there, lead developer of KeePassXC here (and writer of a lot of code). The TOTP and SSH Agent are generally not a security issue. TOTP has no external interfaces and SSH Agent only writes to the known interface standards of those program
7. 7.▲
   by droidmonkey 9y ago

   corrected thank you! I also added links to the 32-bit variants.
8. 8.▲
   by droidmonkey 9y ago

   KeePass is the original, and also not very cross-platform. KeePassX has gone through several iterations and now represents a fairly stable and low-feature release of KeePass with cross-platform support. KeePassXC is where all the new and ex
9. 9.▲
   by droidmonkey 9y ago

   Wow thank you for the kind words! Appreciate the support.