drawkward

7 ms·

1.
by drawkward 2y ago
Perhaps you should use the internet and find out before asking questions that are stupendously biased.
2.
by drawkward 2y ago
Was just discussing this with my wife
3.
by drawkward 2y ago
[flagged]
4.
by drawkward 2y ago
This is not a convincing argument. It tells me nothing about why I should not stand with Europe, rather than American isolationism and pro-Putinism. It doesnt even support your own claim about how Europe "actually" is. Wtf doe
5.
by drawkward 2y ago
Trump is ashamed of losers. Only losers get pissed on.
6.
by drawkward 2y ago
This sounds a lot like being pro-bully. Also, it sounds like you dont unserstand what saber-rattling is. Putin is the one who is saber rattling. We are helping him pay for it by helping him steal land from Ukraine.
7.
by drawkward 2y ago
How is defending against Putin's encroachment on a soverign country "saber-rattling"?
8.
by drawkward 2y ago
...how it actually is? What do you mean?
9.
by drawkward 2y ago
Alternate take: the gilded age was bad for most people, and we dont want to go back.
10.
by drawkward 2y ago
Nothing like being stuck betweentwo hegemons to galvanize a continent. As an American: I stand with Europe.
11.
by drawkward 2y ago
Yes. I see this as a battle against authoritarianism, which is always worth fighting.
12.
by drawkward 2y ago
Well, what we have now is manifestly not conservatism. I would argue it is Yarvinism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin "In his blog Unqualified Reservations, which he wrote from 2007 to 2014, and in
13.
by drawkward 2y ago
MMA-based diplomacy.
14.
by drawkward 2y ago
This is by design. Aleksandr Dugin literally wrote the playbook; it is called "Foundations of Geopolitics": https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics
15.
by drawkward 2y ago
What was that about free markets, Jeff?
16.
by drawkward 2y ago
They are biased against Musk (IMO, there is reason to be; Musk is biased against our democratic norms), but did Jalopnik make this up? Facts don't care about your feelings.
17.
Musk Takes $2.4B Contract from Verizon to Give It to Starlink(jalopnik.com)
41 points by drawkward 2y ago|19 comments
18.
by drawkward 2y ago
Also, recent reporting is indicating that the funding for the Ebola prevention programs has not been restored, contrary to Musk's assertions: https://www.rawstory.com/ebola/
19.
by drawkward 2y ago
Most likely, you have 0 proof of your assertion.
20.
by drawkward 2y ago
Great, so they are turning the LLMs Republican too.
21.
by drawkward 2y ago
The whole administration is showing a lack of understanding of how our entire country, and indeed the current global order, works.
22.
by drawkward 2y ago
So you are saying that a unanimous vote is more likely a coup than a reaction to the horror of the president ordering an attack on innocent protesters? An attack that killed some hundred people, in fact. I guess you could call that a &quot
23.
by drawkward 2y ago
>I reeeaaaallllly don’t want this tool to create unnecessary pressure on regular engineers. Any ideas on how to prevent that? I want the bad energy directing in exposing slackers, not adding stress to everyone else. Then destroy it. It
24.
by drawkward 2y ago
The US has not resumed making payments that were already apportioned by Congress, and cut by DOGE/Trump/Musk.
25.
by drawkward 2y ago
Most eggs are not produced in "liberal states." 1/3 of eggs in the US are produced in Ohio, Indiana and Iowa. Only 30% of eggs are cage-free. https://www.eggsunlimited.com/egg-production-101/ You could
26.
by drawkward 2y ago
We are aware that some people call it a coup, and we point out their factual errors, which are many.
27.
by drawkward 2y ago
Wait, so the birds will get vaccines, but RFKjasdfjkl won't let us humans get them?
28.
by drawkward 2y ago
Bezos is 100% Pro-Trump.
29.
by drawkward 2y ago
Anti-Putin != pro-war pro-Ukraine != pro-war Defending one's sovereign territory is not being pro-war. Only a bully would say that defending oneself from the bully is being aggressive.
30.
by drawkward 2y ago
In more normal times, with a more normal president, I would agree. However, this particular president has shown an absolute lack of interest in the details. It would not surprise me (and is in line with Curtis Yarvin's suggestions

More ›