drawkbox

9 ms·

1.
by drawkbox 2y ago
These systems also came from tinkering. Most programming languages even are really the investment of one person for a long time, doing apparently what you aren't supposed to do. When it comes down to it, whatever works best and is usua
2.
by drawkbox 2y ago
I dig WebComponents because I love building on standards which promote interoperability across frameworks and have long term lifelines. Standards reduce platform + dev lock-in and reduce framework balkanization and frankly chaos in many cas
3.
by drawkbox 2y ago
I like that it mimics SQL queries/filtering which is straightforward. Typically I use something like JSONPath [1] (basically XPath for JSON) [2] or jq for this but having more options with other syntax and style is helpful. For streame
4.
by drawkbox 2y ago
Looks like they have until January to change to fully on-site. That isn't much time to make life changes that allow using 2+ hours extra per day that was typically remote. > The decision marks a significant shift from Amazon’s earl
5.
by drawkbox 2y ago
End of an era. TouchArcade was one of the better review sites and it was great to get featured there. Going for 16 years was a really good run. I hope the people involved land in good places. Game marketing has changed so much during that t
6.
by drawkbox 3y ago
Developers are clearly the weak link today, have given up all power over product and it is sad and why software sucks so bad. It pains the soul that value creators have let the value extractors run the show, because it is now a reality TV &
7.
by drawkbox 3y ago
Again with the ad hominems and strawman arguments in your shadowboxing diversion... I knew you wouldn't answer. You fail to even acknowledge evidence, what do you know about it? Nothing. How do you think evidence comes about? Just show
8.
by drawkbox 3y ago
A "conflict" or false opposition can also be used in a theater like play. Maybe this was setup to get Microsoft to take on the costs/liability and more. Three board members left in 2023 that allowed this to happen. The idea o
9.
by drawkbox 3y ago
No evidence doesn't mean it didn't or won't happen. There is a very large canyon between something happening and evidence. There you have to go off of history, timeline, motive (large piles of money get things to happen) and
10.
by drawkbox 3y ago
Something is up with the timing of that, the dev day and this event. GitHub Copilot is made with OpenAI's Codex model, a descendent of GPT-3 though. Anyone putting anything into ChatGPT is taking a risk, or any third party tool really.
11.
by drawkbox 3y ago
I mostly agree but Web Components is a web standards as is templates/custom elements now. Web Components are a standard. You did ask. heh. As I mentioned, I prefer direct standards or at least frameworks that make standards a main part
12.
by drawkbox 3y ago
I wonder if it is related to this: [Microsoft briefly restricted employee access to OpenAI’s ChatGPT, citing security concerns]( https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/09/microsoft-restricts-employee... )
13.
by drawkbox 3y ago
You fail to acknowledge again. We already agreed to disagree on that point. We are getting your take on things now. Answer these, let's get you on record: Do you think encryption methods today will hold up over time 100%? Do you think
14.
by drawkbox 3y ago
I mostly agree but Web Components is a web standards as is templates/custom elements now. The others like React/Vue/Svelte etc are all going more for platform/framework lock-in over making sure people are doing augmentat
15.
by drawkbox 3y ago
Yeah agreed, that is why I said "if you like the component style of other frameworks but want to use Web Components, Google Lit is quite nice" Lit is just a lighter weight version of that and closer to web standards without having
16.
by drawkbox 3y ago
I completely disagree with your limited focus take on this, aside from the main point of the comment, and you still are not taking into account what others are saying which I shared. You are very focused on "winning" rather than t
17.
by drawkbox 3y ago
Staying closer to web standards is always best for maintainability and portability. I personally like custom direct standards but that doesn't always work in a team for some reason today. There will always be less dependencies in a str
18.
by drawkbox 3y ago
I am more a fan of the augmented style because it doesn't entrap you in dev lock-in to platforms. The problem with frameworks, especially web frameworks, is they reimplement many items that are standard now (shadowdom, components, stor
19.
by drawkbox 3y ago
Now you are into ad hominems. You are completely lost. You can't acknowledge the topic nor the point of concentration in currency, which was 80% percent of my entire point. You are shadowboxing and really have that strawman on the rope
20.
by drawkbox 3y ago
This was my main point "Bitcoin, and other crypto in general even more with higher concentration of early owners, will always be precarious because of this concentration. Whoever has control of the early issued coins, holds a leverage
21.
by drawkbox 3y ago
> find a cryptography expert that agrees with you Do you think they'd be biased to answer in a certain way? Additionally every cryptography expert know the system is only as good as the keys not being found, and that can come from o
22.
by drawkbox 3y ago
Exactly... we don't know yet.
23.
by drawkbox 3y ago
Blast from the past, the Excel easter egg. Solid.
24.
by drawkbox 3y ago
> You originally said that "quantum computers will be able to break satoshi's keys" I said "Eventually with quantum computing or other advancements, someone will break the encryption and potentially swipe the part of
25.
by drawkbox 3y ago
> I was talking about what it takes to brute force a single key. If you have some insight to the tool that created the key you could, lots of systems have doors by design, typically by creators or regulation for export. My main point tho
26.
by drawkbox 3y ago
Might be misdirection PR because of the recent Okta issues which were directly at Okta. [1] Okta having lots of issues last few years. [2] [1] https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/10/okta-says-hackers-b... [
27.
by drawkbox 3y ago
I like the thinking and dependencies are a weight that make at least personal projects more maintenance long term, even if they help in the short term. This doesn't fly at clients/customers usually but what you control needs to be
28.
by drawkbox 3y ago
Breaking the private keys to the concentrated wallet(s) targeted not the entire system. Easiest way is finding/stealing the keys but eventually over time compute does break encryption and keys made with those algos are no longer "
29.
by drawkbox 3y ago
Eventually with quantum computing or other advancements, someone will break the encryption and potentially swipe the part of Satoshi's coin. Bitcoin, and other crypto in general even more with higher concentration of early owners, will
30.
by drawkbox 3y ago
The identity probably isn't one person but there are people that stand out. Nick Szabo has been potentially mentioned as Satoshi for sometime [1] due to him working on decentralized currencies since 1998 with Bit Gold [2]. Elon Musk me

More ›