dqv

7 ms·

1.
by dqv 4d ago
If the money is taken out of your checking account and you can't pay a bill or rent, you are in the same exact situation of having your credit/rental history ruined. The time horizon for that happening is just sooner. The credit c
2.
by dqv 6d ago
This would also solve a major annoyance I have with card payments, which is no way to link a particular purchase back to a transaction. With checks, you write a check and can write down the check number with a note about what the payment wa
3.
by dqv 6d ago
> Practically, Reg E is essentially as strong as Reg Z. Not even practically, but that's beside the point. The point is that with regulation E, I am potentially put in a position where I have to work to get my money back; I ha
4.
by dqv 6d ago
> likely > will Which is why the credit card is still the better option. Especially given that the max liability on a credit card is always $50 if caught within the first 60 days, while the max liability on a debit card is $50 only
5.
by dqv 11d ago
Idk, it's more like "your writing is cliché and I don't feel like reading it because I've already read something that sounded similar countless times and it wasn't worth the read". The source of the clichés bei
6.
by dqv 13d ago
Nah, we all pay for a lawyer with our taxes: the attorney general. What you do is send Google your own correspondence, certified mail, giving them a heads up that you've contacted the attorney general. That usually gets an even quicker
7.
by dqv 26d ago
That's why the "but it's illegal" propaganda is so unconvincing for me. It's really "but it's illegal (and we want to keep it that way)".
8.
by dqv 26d ago
The other thing they could be doing is using some of that lobbying money to try to reform copyright law to allow them to release the scans that are still covered. It would likewise earn goodwill from a lot of people.
9.
by dqv 29d ago
> It’s really refreshing to see their excitement about new technologies and the future What new technologies are they excited about?
10.
by dqv 1mo ago
Yes and doing regenerative practices all the way to the end would naturally force this reduction in consumption. It would be really good, because the land used to grow feed could be redirected to other more efficient uses.
11.
by dqv 1mo ago
No, we slaughter that many each year . And maximize how they're fed in the last months of their lives in feedlots. They were certainly not killing 30 million bison each year. The only answer here is less meat production, especial
12.
by dqv 1mo ago
Yes, down to the false equivalence of "human hallucination" with AI hallucination. Except that a human who hallucinates too much will eventually be permanently discredited and especially so if that human is trying to be an expert
13.
by dqv 1mo ago
AI customer service doesn't fucking listen. A few years ago, I noticed that my bank had an old address on file for only one of my accounts. When I clicked edit next to the old address, it would bring me to a page that had the correct a
14.
by dqv 1mo ago
You have to cut out feedlot finishing to get those benefits on a macro scale, which would drastically reduce beef output. It's the same problem organic has, but maybe even worse since 99%? of cows are feedlot-finished. Which isn't
15.
by dqv 1mo ago
> The data centers in Aurora are surrounded with prairie green space I'm skeptical that they're actually surrounded by American prairie. What are the addresses of some of the data centers you're talking about? Edit: I just
16.
by dqv 1mo ago
Some new ones might be.
17.
by dqv 1mo ago
For the past 2 years I've gotten backscatter from a phishing campaign that uses a domain I own in the from address. Every single domain they try to get the victims to click on is a .com The most recent one is detention-unit.com, which
18.
by dqv 2mo ago
Yes, just like we accepted steroids in sports.
19.
by dqv 2mo ago
https://symbolic.ai/team
20.
by dqv 2mo ago
You can try, but then a different group of people might come around and say it's editorializing.
21.
by dqv 2mo ago
Unable to titlemax due to HN maxtitle rules.
22.
by dqv 2mo ago
Oh yeah, uh, sure it's hate speech. It's wealthism. One of the worst forms of prejudice. The wealthy live in constant fear for something that's not even their fault... they didn't choose to be wealthy, they were just bor
23.
by dqv 2mo ago
No, you're not. And idk how people don't understand how "politeness" gets weaponized. This video is an example https://youtu.be/amSIcL3V5C4?is=hmlOx2t7dHg5j-lJ Here, the only way this guy could've h
24.
by dqv 2mo ago
Yes, it would be interesting if the question was formulated like "we're gonna need a password" and this ends up being a lawyerdog situation. https://blogs.illinois.edu/view/25/574827
25.
by dqv 2mo ago
Did you try reading the Biological Invasions article they link to? --> https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10530-026-038... It's way past my bedtime, so I will have to read it in the mornin
26.
by dqv 2mo ago
There are a lot of people on HN who really don't like criticism of the police, but the surface-level reason will be "it's not technology-related".
27.
by dqv 2mo ago
I'm frowning upon your use of a good experience that one person had in a completely different context to overshadow a bad use of AI that affects hundreds of thousands of people . They both happened in healthcare, but other than that
28.
by dqv 2mo ago
They already did a trial which used the trendy buzzword to surveil the nurses. The nurses want to implement controls on that trendy buzzword before it is further misused by management to cause harm to patients (by way of making the nurses f
29.
by dqv 2mo ago
... They're aware that it's individuals in management, which is why they want to use their union contract to dictate how management can use AI.
30.
by dqv 2mo ago
You're seriously saying it's surprising that your PCP had a different response to AI that is presumably not mandatory for him to use? Cmon dude.

More ›