Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
doxeddaily
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3mo ago
This is a good point. It's a form of future proofing. Hopefully Apple doesn't drop the ball too hard on backward compatibility. For me I just want a set of consistent things from car to car. I have a few different vehicles I mi
2.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3mo ago
This reminds me of the dude on youtube building a chip fab in his shed.
3.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3mo ago
Just based on this conversation we are doomed. Nobody even agrees with you that there is a spending problem. They all think the "wealthy" magically have a ton of untaxed cash flow to solve the insane over spending. There will b
4.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3mo ago
The issue here is everyone expects the government to be their literal daddy. The government isn't there to take care of you.
5.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3mo ago
I'm with you, these people you are arguing with just want to spend us into oblivion. If people think we've had high inflation up until now well... we are just getting started.
6.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3mo ago
A minimum of 2030? That seems excessively pessimistic.
7.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3mo ago
SpaceX already has 10,000 satellites on orbit that are basically preview versions of space data centers. They've already paid 5 years of that 5-10 year timeline you outlined.
8.
▲
by
doxeddaily
4mo ago
This all sounds like really good reasons not to have anything to do with the place.
9.
▲
by
doxeddaily
4mo ago
I actually think the article makes some pretty interesting points. It's not about the name of it though.
10.
▲
by
doxeddaily
5mo ago
Shocking! The owner of a company owns the company! Who knew?
11.
▲
by
doxeddaily
5mo ago
Not bad litmus tests. And yes a lot of idiots seem to fail at steel manning. I mean if you can't steel man your opponent what are you even doing?
12.
▲
by
doxeddaily
8mo ago
Not to mention the Iron Maiden song! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF7cWpBTZ6s
13.
▲
by
doxeddaily
8mo ago
I mean we used dist^2 all the time for comparisons in our game engine back in the 90s (multiple different engines actually). So it was a known thing...
14.
▲
by
doxeddaily
8mo ago
Oxfam are just communists who have lost any credibility with me that they may have ever had.
15.
▲
by
doxeddaily
8mo ago
Which helps nobody because that's not a measure of thriving or even of how well people are doing. It's a useless metric.
16.
▲
by
doxeddaily
8mo ago
Why could it not have been? LLM is just a reasoning machine something Asimov spent a lot of time thinking about.
17.
▲
by
doxeddaily
8mo ago
I also have >30 years and I've had the same experience. I noticed an immediate improvement with 4.5 and I've been getting great results in general. And yes I do make sure it's not generating crazy architecture. It might
18.
▲
by
doxeddaily
9mo ago
This is how I eventually ended up being CTO and eventually CEO. I wanted the overall business to succeed.
19.
▲
by
doxeddaily
9mo ago
As someone who has managed engineers for many years I find those skills immediately applicable to the LLM domain. If you aren't used to communicating what you are trying to build to other engineers I think using the AI is harder as y
20.
▲
by
doxeddaily
9mo ago
I watched a friend of mine minmax Moviepass so hard. They were so doomed.
21.
▲
by
doxeddaily
1y ago
My taxes (flow through LLC) are significantly higher than my income for 2024 (like hundreds of k).
22.
▲
by
doxeddaily
1y ago
This one hit my company pretty hard.
23.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3y ago
>nd why the OS authors are broke OS authors aren't broke. In fact the guys from Microsoft are some of the richest dudes in the world. Maybe OS authors that give away their stuff for free are broke?
24.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3y ago
If you want to get paid maybe don't give away your software for free? This comes across as major sour grapes. "I made this free thing for people to use and they don't pay me for it!!" Ok, then maybe don't give it
25.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3y ago
Electrification is not the goal, reducing net carbon output is the goal. Electrification is simply one of the methods we can use. For things like air travel carbon neutral fuels are likely a better short to medium term solution (in the lon
26.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3y ago
What do you mean by tax benefits? Paying less tax? Or services they get? It's unclear here.
27.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3y ago
Terrific Ohio Scientific! I love the old ads lol. Except I also read these mags back in the 80s.
28.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3y ago
If ya ain't got nothin, you ain't got nothin to lose. But if life is working well this is pretty bad advice.
29.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3y ago
Coke Zero has been reformulated multiple times. I think "diet coke" is still the same crap and still tastes bad.
30.
▲
by
doxeddaily
3y ago
How many fat people have you seen lose weight and keep it off forever? Not very damn many that's for sure.
More ›