dortlick

4 ms·

1.
by dortlick 1y ago
Sure, but what about the collective investment in smartphones, digital cameras, laptops, even cars. Not much modern technology is useful and practical after 10 years, let alone 20. AI is probably moving a little faster than normal, but tech
2.
by dortlick 1y ago
Yeah I thought that was strange. Wouldn't it be important to have more recent data?
3.
by dortlick 1y ago
Why don't they?
4.
by dortlick 1y ago
There is literally no indication in the article that this has anything to do with apple other than them being a potential user of the TSMC 2nm process. Strange they tried to connect this story to apple.
5.
by dortlick 1y ago
The source for this "article" is a company trying to sell an air travel related service that would be out of business if airlines changes their pricing model. It's also clearly written with AI hence the bullet point recap at
6.
by dortlick 1y ago
Don't we already have individual pricing on lots of things like used cars, contractors doing work on your house, car insurance, etc? Most people that work in sales have some ability to adjust pricing based on their personal judgement o
7.
by dortlick 1y ago
Kilocalories. A unit of energy that equals 4184 Joules.
8.
by dortlick 1y ago
It doesn't have to "completely" replace any individual employee to be impactful. If you have 50 coders that each use AI to boost their productivity by 10%, you need 5 fewer coders. It doesn't require that AI is able to h
9.
by dortlick 1y ago
It doesn't have to be "or". It's entirely possible that AI researchers both believe AI breakthroughs are coming and also act in their own financial self interest by taking a lucrative job offer.