dontblink

11 ms·

1.
by dontblink 5mo ago
I can imagine they would be interested in creating features to generate 3d models.
2.
by dontblink 1y ago
Opencore legacy patcher would be to differ.
3.
by dontblink 2y ago
Wasn't that said of Benito Mussolini?
4.
by dontblink 3y ago
Every sapphire (3) I have had has failed. I luckily got one rmaed but that starting freezing my computer after a year. Switched to XFX Merc 319 6950xt. I hope this serves me better.
5.
by dontblink 3y ago
Technically you are correct. In practice this is difficult to implement though. If you disagree, please provide a PoC?
6.
by dontblink 3y ago
Sometimes the simplest explanation is the most probable and there is no wide spread conspiracy. Youtube does experiments based on user-agents. I think this is well known and if not, a former Googler just let you know. In any case, for thos
7.
by dontblink 3y ago
I think it's in part that they don't want to seem to compete with Samsung so they have to define themselves as mid tier.
8.
by dontblink 3y ago
So Waymo/Google winning here in your opinion?
9.
by dontblink 3y ago
Could be one about WW2 actually!
10.
by dontblink 3y ago
Just an FYI here: Google's community support forums aren't well named as their intended purpose is for users to answer other user's questions. For the community to support each other. For actual support you need a paid accou
11.
by dontblink 3y ago
Google famously underpays as it leverages it's name. Startups can't really compete on total compensation because so much is tied to equity which can be made liquid in the case of big tech. At the same time, startups don't wan
12.
by dontblink 4y ago
It's been forked. I'm no lawyer, but I think they could.
13.
by dontblink 4y ago
Is it though? He hasn't really moved the needle for Google at all other than capitalizing on growth laid out by his predecessors. Satya is far more admired for his accomplishments comparitivly.
14.
by dontblink 4y ago
No. Seems like the article is making assumptions.
15.
by dontblink 4y ago
I don't understand why the disgruntled companies don't simply band together and remove their apps from Apple until Apple complies? Apple is as reliant on their third party apps for their ecosystems as much as the inverse.
16.
by dontblink 4y ago
Have you ever tried virtual desktops? It was a huge benefit for me.
17.
by dontblink 4y ago
I feel the same. Now Twitter will potentially be manipulated by him. He will have a lot more sway over public opinion.
18.
by dontblink 4y ago
Switching every two years is a red flag for employers and is called out during hiring in many companies. Every 3-4 years seems to indicate a better uptick in interest / offers in my experience. Otherwise the concern from many Hiring Ma
19.
by dontblink 4y ago
Trimming the fat can be used to also be net zero in employment loss. E.g. cutting projects that are not going to make money and reinvest the effort from Engineers into extending more impactful (profitable?) products.
20.
by dontblink 4y ago
This doesn't work in a company of large size. There is a reason it's called 120% rule at Google.
21.
by dontblink 4y ago
Well, allies can ask friendly governments for information on their own citizens without violating and of their own privacy laws. So it can be useful as a circumvention tool for them.
22.
by dontblink 4y ago
It equalizes them. And products on AliExpress are cheaper. But that, of course, depends on the US relationship with China which doesn't seem to be getting friendlier.
23.
by dontblink 4y ago
Regarding the rules surrounding fake information, I wonder why the be EU hasn't taken a similar stance against Fox News equivalencies?
24.
by dontblink 4y ago
Bezos has Washington Post as his mouthpiece. Murdoch has Fox News. Musk doesn't really need more money. I don't think this is just pump and dump. Is it possible Musk is looking to buy a method to influence a populace for his own
25.
by dontblink 5y ago
But there is no forcible capture of an audience. Users can download and use a browser pretty easily. Even in the Denuvo case, there is still pirate activity on games that employ it (albeit no 0 days).
26.
by dontblink 5y ago
This is an interesting argument. But this is effectively stating that Google has to be a good steward. If that is the case, then there really isn't much of a problem afaict (i.e. majority is happy). If Google is treating devs and user
27.
by dontblink 5y ago
But why is that a worry? This happened before when IE6 dominated. Firefox was liberation. It can be that again and has set precedent.
28.
by dontblink 5y ago
Almost always the answer to a question in a headline is No (Betteridge's law of headlines). I think there is a lot of wishful thinking about breaking SV's dominance. Reasons being that it is such a HCOL area and how great would
29.
by dontblink 5y ago
You are using Safari (actually webkit) with a Chrome UI.
30.
by dontblink 5y ago
I'd imagine at some point depriving sites of revenue will lead to adversarial outcomes where many if not all will simply refuse to load. So if ad blockers become mainstream it will be interesting change to the web.

More ›