domq

9 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by domq 1y ago

   The technical term is “recession”
2. 2.▲
   by domq 1y ago

   Indeed it shouldn't. We are herd animals.
3. 3.▲
   by domq 1y ago

   The US being the one that showeth us the way of the fall that cometh huh?
4. 4.▲
   by domq 1y ago

   ... You have no idea how the internet works do you. Why are you here?
5. 5.▲
   by domq 1y ago

   Simple. The former is economic warfare against the US, under pretense of the EU “parliament” giving a hoot about its constituents. The latter is plain old fascism.
6. 6.▲
   by domq 3y ago

   This is basically the only reply that everyone on this thread should read. Thanks for your research.
7. 7.▲
   by domq 3y ago

   That is a correct and fair assessment of the impact, assuming the change lands in a release as-is (which apparently it won't: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2023-12/msg00... )
8. 8.▲
   by domq 3y ago

   The “or maybe not?” part of the message you are replying to, tells me that someone got told.
9. 9.▲
   by domq 3y ago

   Forking Emacs on such grounds is a symptom of ego malfunction. The proper step (after diplomacy has failed, which it hasn't yet in this instance) is to author an alternate implementation of the feature in Emacs Lisp and publish it.
10. 10.▲
    by domq 3y ago

    I have a hard time putting faith in that “balkanization theory” from the '90s anymore. A fork gains traction if and only if it manages to get ahead of the mainline feature-wise, and stay there, by a sufficiently wide margin for custome
11. 11.▲
    by domq 5y ago

    Can you please substantiate that point?