dogemaster2028

5 ms·

1.
by dogemaster2028 9mo ago
You are speculating wildly. You don’t have to be racist. Even British can be bad spellers. And non native English speakers can be perfect English grammarians. In America, foreigners can be citizens. In certain polls, not all legal immigrant
2.
by dogemaster2028 9mo ago
- Jon Richelieu-Booth for posting a picture of himself with a gun in the US - Jordan Parlour for Facebook posts that were deemed ‘hateful.’ - Bernadette Spofforth for a post with a “mild inaccuracy” - Maxie Allen and Rosalind Levine, after
3.
by dogemaster2028 9mo ago
If I was speaking badly about you in social media, I would understand it if you don’t want me at your house.
4.
by dogemaster2028 9mo ago
Why would tourists want to come to a place they dislike? I don’t go to UK anymore for example.
5.
by dogemaster2028 9mo ago
You are allowed to say it. Unlike UK, you won’t be arrested. But you won’t be allowed in. Besides, why would you want to come if you don’t like it here?
6.
by dogemaster2028 9mo ago
Something I haven’t seen discussed here is the role of capitalism as the biggest lift to the quality of humans lives (in addition to things like vaccines and health departments or generally science). The notion of Incentives in human nature
7.
by dogemaster2028 10mo ago
The problem, at least in our American mindset, is that since America’s birth, there has been a marked reluctance to have unelected bodies be responsible for anything that impacts the people, ESPECIALLY anything that presumes some globalizat
8.
by dogemaster2028 10mo ago
In a constitutional republic like the US, it’s simply too risky to execute major improvements in a big bang fashion. It’s not that different from engaging in a multi-decade software migration project. Sometimes, small changes is really the
9.
by dogemaster2028 10mo ago
The Supreme Court is not “a political opponent.” It’s literally the way the country works. It found the requirements for states to participate to be unconstitutional. In fact, it was also SCOTUS who eventually determined in 2012 that the in
10.
by dogemaster2028 10mo ago
It’s relevant because while the comment says that “they’re okay giving up buying first-class tickets” what they really imply is that they want everyone to give up buying first class tickets. If they want to constrain their own choices to he
11.
by dogemaster2028 10mo ago
It’s good that they choose to do that themselves. In fact, the US allows you to SEND THE GOVERNMENT A GIFT at https://www.pay.gov/public/search/global?formSearchCategory=... (You can even Venmo) If you want to do
12.
by dogemaster2028 10mo ago
You aren’t. You are required to buy LIABILITY, which is protection in case you harm SOMEONE ELSE. You are not required to protect YOURSELF. In some states, if you can post a bond, you aren’t even required to carry liability. The government
13.
by dogemaster2028 10mo ago
Why is buying first class tickets bad?
14.
by dogemaster2028 10mo ago
Obamacare failed at reducing costs. It mostly focused on insurance expansion and in consumer protections, not on dealing with hospital, drug, and provider pricing structures that actually drive the spending in the US healthcare system.
15.
by dogemaster2028 10mo ago
This is factually incorrect and in fact the opposite of what a Cadillac plan means. Obamacare plans are actually the opposite: they are high deductible with limited networks. Obamacare plans typically have deductibles between $5,000 to $9,0