dnesteruk

5 ms·

1.
by dnesteruk 11y ago
Check out my screencast on Cling (which is CINT's successor): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lbi7MLS03Yc
2.
by dnesteruk 11y ago
Yes indeed, thanks for pointing this out.
3.
Living with Microsoft C++ Compiler Bugs and Ambiguities(reddit.com)
1 points by dnesteruk 11y ago|0 comments
4.
by dnesteruk 11y ago
Doesn't the GPL license generally ruin being able to use this in a commercial product by having to provide source code and affecting derivative works, too?
5.
by dnesteruk 11y ago
Looking at the HTML output, I'm not sure this consitutes proper literal programming due to the amounts of 'contextual noise' that the processor generates. I think the goal is to have the program read more or less like a book,
6.
by dnesteruk 11y ago
Yes, teaching VHDL/FPGA.
7.
by dnesteruk 11y ago
Also check out http://activemesa.com/x2c
8.
by dnesteruk 11y ago
I tried using F# (FsTest, specifically) for testing. It's great to be able to write verbose test names with double-backquote syntax, that way your test cases read in English instead of this_ugly_underscore_based_sentences.
9.
by dnesteruk 11y ago
Source code available for rendering the images?
10.
by dnesteruk 11y ago
Well there's no specific support for things like CUDA, but C++ support works for the most part. Not for CUDA's triple-angled-chevrons (yet), but neither does Visual Studio itself :)
11.
by dnesteruk 12y ago
Actually, this isn't the day and age where native code IDE can be presented to be advantageous. I think what's sensible is to assume that no thick-client IDE is sufficient for arbitrarily sized projects.
12.
by dnesteruk 12y ago
It woudl be great if you posted a few more screenshots of the IDE. I mean full-size ones.
13.
by dnesteruk 12y ago
Regrettably, fact of the matter is that fonts look bad on Java, particularly on Windows where Java-enabled programs are unable (for whatever reason) to leverage ClearType and thus get the antialiasing done just right.
14.
by dnesteruk 12y ago
Compared to VAX, R# is aiming at 100% code fidelity. This means not skipping on macros and the like when performing analysis.
15.
by dnesteruk 12y ago
There are no such plans, at least for the time being.
16.
by dnesteruk 12y ago
Interesting, I've written very much the same thing with the same name. Only difference is I've written it using C++.
17.
by dnesteruk 12y ago
meh
18.
by dnesteruk 12y ago
Another equally potent idea is to build products which integrate with Microsoft's own, popular products. For example, the popularity of Excel caused me to build this: http://activemesa.com/x2c
19.
by dnesteruk 12y ago
In theory, I don't see why not. For instance, you could have a language that is adapted for both the JVM, CLR and native and also cross-compiles to JavaScript.
20.
by dnesteruk 12y ago
That course isn't really well done. There are much better quant courses out there on Coursera.
21.
by dnesteruk 12y ago
Same here. And I got one of those ATRAC players, too.
22.
by dnesteruk 13y ago
Nice title, lousy default-width typesetting; nobody has an e-reader that will fit this, and it would look equally bad in print. Also, it's 'formulae' not 'formulas'.
23.
TypeScript Support in ReSharper 8.1(blogs.jetbrains.com)
2 points by dnesteruk 13y ago|0 comments
24.
by dnesteruk 13y ago
Oh for the love of... it IS a top managed language. Probably the best general-purpose language on the market right now. Not the most widely used, of course, but one of the most enjoyable.
25.
by dnesteruk 13y ago
This is shameless advertising.
26.
by dnesteruk 13y ago
Has anyone outside Google used Go for any major commercial development? Are there any success stories out there to read up on?
27.
by dnesteruk 13y ago
D is great but lack of tool support (proper intellisense) means we're all stabbing in the dark trying to figure out what function to use, where it comes from and what its parameters are supposed to take. Also, really needs declarative paral
28.
by dnesteruk 13y ago
Throw up something like MindTouch Core and let people self-register and organize themselves. All you really need is the landing page explaining what the site is about. As far as promotion goes, well, that's up to you.
29.
ReSharper’s Web Path Mapping Explained(blogs.jetbrains.com)
1 points by dnesteruk 13y ago|0 comments
30.
Using ReSharper with MonoTouch Applications(blogs.jetbrains.com)
22 points by dnesteruk 14y ago|1 comments

More ›