dmitry-k

18 ms·

1.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
Agree. However, large enterprises usually have common compliance/access control policies, something not easily implemented across multiple VCS (unless there's a full-fledged internal development team dedicated to that). Working in
2.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
At RhodeCode ( https://rhodecode.com ) we believe it's up to a team to decide, which version control better fits their needs and preferences. Some companies even have Git, Mercurial, and SVN, working all together under centra
3.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
@e12e Try RhodeCode ( https://rhodecode.com ), we have quite a few educational users (e.g. Carnegie Mellon University) using RhodeCode in the way you described. RhodeCode also has secure authorization, user permission management a
4.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
Couldn't agree more. In RhodeCode ( https://rhodecode.com ) we use Pull Requests with a voting system. Interested reviewers are added automatically, depending on the repository and the changes being made.
5.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
Merge and rebase for pull requests might soon land in RhodeCode too.
6.
RhodeCode 4.4 Released(rhodecode.com)
3 points by dmitry-k 10y ago|0 comments
7.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
Mozilla uses Mercurial too. Not to mention other companies from all the different industries using Mercurial with RhodeCode.
8.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
RhodeCode is self-hosted, but you can run it in Azure/Amazon cloud. For large companies, that setup might prove even more stable than relying on someone else's cloud [1] [1] GitHub's down? https://news.ycombinator.
9.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
@dvdgsng We're better than ever, thanks! I don't know if you heard, RhodeCode CE is now free and open source. Feel free to join our Slack: https://rhodecode.com/join We'll be rolling out a major release next
10.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
>No more productivity drop when github is down It could have been the motto of RhodeCode ( https://rhodecode.com ). Self-hosted repository management not only has a benefit of having one's uptime under control, but also is
11.
Ask HN: Most Popular Version Control Systems in 2016?
7 points by dmitry-k 10y ago|0 comments
12.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
That's not true. Some parts (e.g. CSS and images) never were open source. You can read more about why RhodeCode went back to open source (AGPL) here: https://rhodecode.com/blog/113/rhodecode-goes-open-source
13.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
@zardeh Totally agree in that adding friction is bad. At Rhodecode, we tried to eliminate it, by creating a dedicated page for contributors ( https://rhodecode.com/open-source ) and allowing to login via GitHub / BitBuck
14.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
RhodeCode is free and open source: https://rhodecode.com/open-source . https://try.rhodecode.com : #1 It plays nicely with existing trackers and CI tools. #2 RhodeCode fully supports Git, Mercurial & SVN (hen
15.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
@lackbeard https://try.rhodecode.com RhodeCode has a modern UI, with automated PR's, and configurable integrations(CI/issue trackers) across Git/Mercurial/SVN. Since RhodeCode is open source, it can be tailo
16.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
RhodeCode has a configurable diff limit. There's no problem in displaying 10K+ lines in a diff. https://rhodecode.com/features/productivity In fact, it's a part of our code review/pull request functional
17.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
@ghettosoak, Dmitry from RhodeCode team is here! Have you considered https://rhodecode.com ? RhodeCode CE is free, self-hosted & open-source, with code review tools, user management, and automations. It takes ~5mins to get y
18.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
Nice post on the SaaS offerings! That, however, is not an option for enterprises where source code is that critical, it should "never leave the perimeter". Those firms need a behind-the-firewall kind of security, under a common so
19.
by dmitry-k 10y ago
Thanks! Added the license information (we're AGPL) and links to the source code.