dmilicev2

5 ms·

1.
by dmilicev2 4mo ago
I believe so, sounds logical, yes. I haven’t measured it across LLMs to tell you if there is more/less overhead, confusion, hallucinations, repeated mistakes etc..
2.
by dmilicev2 4mo ago
I feel like there should be a consistent protocol, an industry standard for interacting with AIs, I do see value in it, however, as you said, it doesn’t seem like there’s value in turning the entire web or everything we can think of into an
3.
by dmilicev2 4mo ago
foo, bar?
4.
by dmilicev2 4mo ago
Thank you Mahjabinbm, looking forward to it.
5.
by dmilicev2 4mo ago
Yes. It's a continuous and steady flow of dopamine until you run out of tokens.
6.
by dmilicev2 5mo ago
I experienced this friction. Maintenance of memory across projects, across different LLMs, is a recipe for frustration and disaster. This MCP tool I made might help elicit desired behaviour from Turn 0: https://github.com/tu
7.
by dmilicev2 5mo ago
Yes, and that's one of the reasons I started working on this tool: to elicit desirable behavior from AIs before turn 1. AI is still non-deterministic and won't follow instructions 100% of the time, but with this tool, I intend to
8.
by dmilicev2 5mo ago
I'm not sure what the best course of action is here, but I fail to see the benefits to society if we were to set up legal entities for each AI agent at this stage. I think the responsibility should lie on the shoulders of the individua
9.
by dmilicev2 5mo ago
Me neither. If true artificial sentience is achieved, what does that say about us?
10.
by dmilicev2 5mo ago
AI is not sentient, therefore not liable for its actions. It would be pointless. We ought to look one step beyond the lines of code for liability. Unless the AI eventually passes the bar of sentience.
11.
Show HN: TurnZero – Persistent Expert for LLMs
2 points by dmilicev2 5mo ago|0 comments