dkdcio

7 ms·

1.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
fair enough! the jump from that to ChatGPT’s launch (which I didn’t find that interesting), to gpt-4, to Claude Code/Codex CLI, to Gemini 3/Opus 4.5/GPT 5.2 has been insane in such a short time. I’m excited (since the release
2.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
technical preview in June 2021. I was using it for a bit before that as an internal employee. so they may have rounded up slightly or also were an internal beta test side note, I’ve been trying to remember when it launched internally if any
3.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
> Imagine the ad police. “You blogged about a product. Someone said you sounded insincere. Let’s see the receipt for purchase. Can’t prove you bought it? Prove you weren’t compensated for your blog post or pay a fine.” Kafka land. immedi
4.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
and you can switch AI providers, or use local LLMs. again, a nonsense point to raise about how FOSS is developed. coding “by hand” also doesn’t go away. if you lose your proprietary tools (laptop, OS, IDE, or coding agent) you can always wo
5.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
information flows fine without paid ads, and with much better incentives > people can pay to have their messages displayed where they will be seen …why? distribution of information is free across the world, which was not the case a centu
6.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
this argument is nonsense…I write code on a macbook running macos. it’s not a subscription, but some people also pay a subscription for a proprietary IDE. so any FOSS written with proprietary paid software doesn’t count to you? only if it’s
7.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
just fine? what do you think would happen/what’s your actual argument against out of curiosity
8.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
- performance is often better, especially on “out of core” (“streaming”, spill to disk data sizes). Polars has done a ton of work on their streaming engine but they’re still catching up - you don’t need to use Python (but Pythonic wrappers
9.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
…why do all of those things happen? to sell paid digital advertisement. remove that incentive and I suspect the “social media” problems largely go away
10.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
I was expecting this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple%E2%80%93FBI_encryption_d... still doesn’t really prove much
11.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
you can set breakpoint() to open an IPython REPL with whatever customizations you want (e.g. I turn on vim keybindings)
12.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
I was not aware you shouldn’t do that — what’s the rationale/historical context?
13.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
a few reasons: - agents tend to need (already have) a filesystem anyway to be useful (not technically required but generally true, they’re already running somewhere with a filesystem) - LLMs have a ton of CLI/filesystem stuff in their
14.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
that’s not what I said. you honestly seem like you just want to argue about stuff (e.g. not elaborating on the “no” when I basically repeated and agreed with what you said). and you seem to consistently miss my point (in the second part of
15.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
> OpenAI's GPT 5.2 is using the same base model as 4o where’s that info from?
16.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
I think we agree then? the tech is useful; you need systems around them (like sandboxes and commit hooks that prevent leaking secrets) to use them effectively (along with learned skills) very little software (or hardware) used in production
17.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
…what is your point exactly (and concisely)? I’m saying it doesn’t matter it’s probabilistic, everything is, the tech is still useful
18.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
not the same person but in the flow of doing things those little pauses (tens of milliseconds) do matter. I open/close nvim (and less-so tmux) a ton, and run lots of commands per day. I don’t want to wait and once you get used to thing
19.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
I was pointing out one screenshot from twitter isn’t proof of anything just to be clear; it’s a silly way to make a point. yes AI makes leaking keys on GH more prevalent, but so what? it’s the same problem as before with roughly the same so
20.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
I’m not understanding your point… (and would be genuinely curious to)? the models and systems around them have evolved and gotten better (over the past few years for LLMs and decades for “AI” more broadly) oh I think I do get your point now
21.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
like my other comment, my point is one screenshot from twitter vs one anecdote. neither proves anything. cool snarky response though!
22.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
you could find tons of API keys on GitHub before these “agentic” tools too. that was my point, one screenshot from twitter vs one anecdote from me. I don’t think either proves the point, but posting a screenshot from twitter like it’s proof
23.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
I think you’re correct. the reproduction isn’t very precise and the solution doesn’t seem right (I’m not seeing anything about the non-standard pages not being freed). I’d guess this was ignored because it was wrong…
24.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
I started heavy usage in April 2025 (Codex CLI -> some Claude Code and trying other CLIs + a bit of Cursor -> Warp.dev -> Claude Code) and I’m still learning as well (and constantly trying to get more efficient) (I had been using G
25.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
you’re just repeating the straw man. if you can’t think critically and just regurgitate every dumb thing you hear idk what to tell you. nobody serious thinks a “singularity” is coming. there’s not even a proper definition of “AGI” your argu
26.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
I have tons of examples of AI not committing secrets. this is one screenshot from twitter? I don’t think it makes your point CPUs are billions of transistors. sometimes one fails and things still work. “probabilistic quicksand” isn’t the di
27.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
this is a straw man, nobody serious is promising that. it is a skill like any other that requires learning
28.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
(i.e. competitors can still use Claude models but haven’t achieved the same DevEx as CC so far, at least in my opinion and many others) also while I was initially on the “they should open source” boat, and I’m happy Codex CLI did, there are
29.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
in this case they’re just British mate
30.
by dkdcio 8mo ago
how so?

More ›