diogenes1

7 ms·

1.
by diogenes1 4y ago
you fired the gun, not the manufacturer. why would they arrest the manufacturer/inventor/etc for something that was done by you?
2.
by diogenes1 4y ago
there have been multiple coordinated attacks being made, it's quite naiive to assume US is not involved here
3.
by diogenes1 4y ago
unlike 'peer 2 peer' cash usecases of crypto. ethereum added a lot of social elements to it with ens names. All sorts of common folk use tornado cash to keep their private transactions separate from their public address
4.
by diogenes1 4y ago
this right here, is the crux of the argument
5.
by diogenes1 4y ago
true. none of smart contract blockchains today are actually a practical tool till lightclients that run on smartphones are mainstream
6.
by diogenes1 4y ago
so when are we arresting engineers who built roads and trucks that were used for money laundering?
7.
by diogenes1 4y ago
Source - ChrisLemont get off your high horse, use of tornado cash is quite common among crypto natives, otherwise it's like broadcasting your pepsi purchases on instagram
8.
by diogenes1 4y ago
even more shameful is the tone of conversation regarding this in internet forums now vs in 1993. How the hell can you be pro arrest of developers
9.
by diogenes1 4y ago
one of the most shameful moments in digital human rights after the arrest of pgp creator in 1993. Code is speech, it is not a weapon. Banning maths is fascist
10.
by diogenes1 4y ago
which is fine, since you can back another cpi/whatever automated chainlink index adjusted asset with it. Sure the efficiency will not be as good as fiat but it's robust
11.
by diogenes1 4y ago
so badly written wtf
12.
by diogenes1 4y ago
Didn't know they had a gateway. at least there will be competition to infura till stateless clients allow running clients through browsers/wallets directly