didjathinkmess

6 ms·

1.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
I hear Myocarditis is absolutely huge in the 4 and under age group! Just trying to get out in front of this.
2.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
Natural immunity followed by a single dose is the strongest immunity available supposedly. Many of us likely have cross reactive immunity from a previous Coronavirus infection from before the pandemic. Regarding "better antibodies&quot
3.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
>So, yes, vaccination may not prevent being infected, but for sure it helps immensely in avoiding being hospitalized and shortening the infection, which does actually translate in less people being infected. On the flip side, infections
4.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
Good comment, also: the vaccinated are a fertile ground for mutations that eventually evade the vaccine. Unless you have a study that backs up the claim that this mutation phenomenon only happens in people not vaccinated for Covid-19, you s
5.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
You're comparing mRNA vaccines to traditional vaccines. Unlikely outcome sure. So is getting autism from a traditional vaccine but the warning still appears on the MMR vaccine insert.
6.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
>Vaccines rapidly lose efficacy when the virus they target has free real estate (vectors) in which to mutate. The finger pointing game really has to stop considering anyone vaccinated can contract, get sick from, act as a vector/pet
7.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
I believe the word slip is 100% intentional. It's the same kind of people that conflate, on purpose, "the vaccines are 95% effective!" with the wishful notion that they stop the spread of the virus.
8.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
The author refers to getting innoculated as "immunized" which is about as scientific as flat earth. The rest of the article isn't much better. If everyone was actually immunized, we would have hit Fauci's early number o
9.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
I haven't heard of a shorter duration with vaccination. Could you please post the source for this?
10.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
He's talking about transmission, you are talking about reduction of symptoms. The vaccines don't prevent transmission. Now follow that to its logical conclusion: "we forcefully vaccinated everyone on Earth, why are we still
11.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
Interesting how this peer review argument comes out selectively and not when something like Surgisphere happens and their bogus findings are immediately passed off as the ultimate truth. I see that towards the end of your comment that you&
12.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
That's up to the reader to judge. I always advise doing your own research. For example look at the history of the Atlantic, which political side do they align with, have they ever said anything unbiased about Ivermectin, etc. Another
13.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
Okay cool, pretend the page's only purpose is a collection of links to medical studies. Find anything amiss with any of actual 64 studies? Or are you content to just not move past the web site itself.
14.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
Why take the biased article at its word? Luckily we have access to all of these studies and can do the research ourselves (thanks Internet!) https://ivmmeta.com/ The current count of medical studies that show Ivermectin bei
15.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
You heard it hear first: Ivermectin people have been pushing snake oil (nothing specific, just general snake oil.. like Ivermectin!) for 1000 years. Should I ask him for a source?
16.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
Took a look through through that Intercept article. It reads like any of the biased opinion based drivel passing for journalism these days. Trying to conflate politics with medicine and say Doctors who risked their careers to speak up for
17.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
Trick question, they're both censorship.
18.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
Just because I don't agree with Nazis who want to take my guns away, doesn't mean I want to censor them. It's much more useful to engage with them and get into an open discussion. I stand up for their right to say whatever
19.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. It's a meta analysis of 25 different studies and some will have flaws of course. For me, if one single study showed positive results and had a valid methodology, that'd be eno
20.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
Please circle back and post that article. That would be the first that I've heard of any difference in time between the two. Honestly it sounds suspicious.
21.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
Less likely to be sick and.. That's it. Equally as likely to spread the Delta variant if we're considering viral load as the metric. That's only compared to an unvaccinated person who has not previously had an infection (i.e
22.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
Um yeah, what's the virus going to do, die off? Of course not, it's going to mutate and continue to survive in as many hosts as possible. A mutation that's more easily transmitted but less deadly (which jives with the lower
23.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
>They are overflowing because of the unvaccinated. Source for this claim? Asking because I see stats being thrown around constantly: unvaccinated are 97% of ICU patients, etc. The only problem is, there's no data to back it up. I&#x
24.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
The video was censored because Paul states cloth masks are worse than N95 masks for infection. Which is scientifically accurate as far as I know. So it's gotten a significant step worse. It has gone from "do not question the sci
25.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
That's not at all what the paper says. >The OP alleges it can't sufficiently mutate among the vaccinated, so their recommendation of full vaccination to eliminate the virus is perfectly consistent. From the study: "We conc
26.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
"It is still unknown whether COVID-19 Variants are evolving randomly or under the selection pressure generated by mitigation efforts." Very interesting. My thesis for the new highly contagious variants is they are from the vaccin
27.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
> What is the damage that has been done? Runoff from crops getting into aquifers, rivers, reservoirs which turns into drinking water for humans. Later it will rain contaminated water all over our properties, gardens, bodies
28.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
Up until the landmark ruling against Monsanto in 2018, there would be pro-glyphosate shills polluting forums like Hacker News with misleading statements and outright lies. After the initial court case that ruled in favor of a grounds keepe
29.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
What you're describing is called vaccine induced immunity or artificial immunity. Natural immunity is from an infection with no vaccines involved. You know, naturally. Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33129951
30.
by didjathinkmess 5y ago
"The new data found that fully vaccinated people who get infected carry as much of the virus in their nose as unvaccinated people, and could spread it to others" There goes that "for the greater good" incentive for getti

More ›