dhmholley

5 ms·

1.
by dhmholley 11y ago
For a guy who doesn't take himself too seriously, he sure creates a lot of sockpuppets to argue with his detractors and sing his own praises.
2.
by dhmholley 11y ago
(Though unfortunately not HN)
3.
by dhmholley 11y ago
If you have some citations for that I'd be interested in reading them, because I've never heard that before.
4.
by dhmholley 11y ago
And unfortunately it often is used that way, by people who don't understand that animal testing would have caught the birth defects had it been tested on pregnant animals (advocating, if anything, for more thorough animal testing, not
5.
by dhmholley 12y ago
It's not offensive so much as you're generalising from personal experience to assert that Christian friendships are somehow qualitatively different from friendships as found in the Kabbalistic or Western Buddhist traditions, which
6.
by dhmholley 12y ago
> once you experience healthy, constructive, no-judging, be-yourself community with other Christians These qualities are neither exclusive to, nor always found in, Christians.
7.
by dhmholley 12y ago
I hope the source isn't too horrible. I was basically a complete javascript novice when I started coding the game. If I were to write it again I'd probably do it very differently, though I still have a lot to learn.
8.
by dhmholley 12y ago
It astounds me how people will happily let companies off the hook for causing negative externalities, while simultaneously blaming the government for failing to regulate them effectively and decrying the regulation in the first place. &quot
9.
by dhmholley 12y ago
Inclusiveness means not discriminating against people based on who they are. It's the very simple idea that white people, black people, gay people and straight people are all people - they are entitled the same rights and the same prot
10.
by dhmholley 12y ago
Are people still blowing this whistle? Tolerance for people is not the same as tolerance for speech, or tolerance for actions. You are not a victim if people disapprove of your bigotry - your speech may be protected, but you are not protect
11.
by dhmholley 12y ago
Are you seriously suggesting that people should be tolerant of intolerance? And are you really bemoaning the fact that it is becoming less socially acceptable to be a hateful bigot in public? Or is this satire? I genuinely can't tell.
12.
by dhmholley 12y ago
Action against those in positions of power who cause harm to others is meaningfully different to action against those who are already victimised. The first is a movement for social change that increases the net good in the world, the second
13.
by dhmholley 13y ago
Aside from the fact that the Daily Mail is a tabloid which makes its money primarily from inflaming right-wing sensibilities while misreporting or fabricating stories, this seems like a particularly ludicrous assertion considering that it w