dhhdhdsbdb

7 ms·

1.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
There is a documented history of this kind of thing. See https://www.vox.com/2015/1/15/7551873/jaywalking-history
2.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
Totally agreed, and I'm not even much of an investor.
3.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
In the US, regulating sex was a priority that predates the government by a couple hundred years.
4.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
Can you segment by Geo? It may be that users with slower connections or phones use Google more
5.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
I think this is a great way to spread info. You're there, probably doing nothing. And everyone has to pee!
6.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
Otoh, governments can detain, arrest, or kill you and your family. Regardless of whether you can vote. Both corporations and governments have a history of bad behavior. But I warrant the government ledger has much worse capacity to do me ha
7.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
Im sorry, but I really don't understand your perspective. Does Porsche screw their customers when they charge $500 for an oil change? Is Coach "screwing" it's customer by charging that much for a purse? High five audio d
8.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
The amazing book 1491 calls this Holmbergs mistake: that the indigenous people lined in a static world and didn't have the agency to make their own mistakes.
9.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
Are you recommending we don't work this avenue out of a sense of fairness?
10.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
Is this true? I always thought the decline was more often caused by removing habitats. Would be curious to know how this is measured and communicated.
11.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
Otoh, we have far more marketers, professional writers, video editors, programmers, and people who make their own profits via YouTube etc. And a drastic drop in birth rate should mean fewer people so favor labor.
12.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
this is the book that introduced me to this origin story! It's a very well written, and short, book. Highly recommend.
13.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
Because the upside of continuing to take money from Venezuela is outweighed by the risk that you miss someone specific, or accidentally sell to someone you're not supposed to. Why would these companies, already in hot water federally,
14.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
Sure, but it's naive to think everyone will get along if we just wish for it hard enough. There need to be ways of limiting communities to subgroups. Anecdotally, an example is ladies tea events in social circles. If you ask women who
15.
by dhhdhdsbdb 7y ago
Yes, because the suburbs are always a good option for families who aren't into the whole collective living thing. And it makes sense. When you have a kid, that kid is your priority. There's less incentice to be willing to sacrific