dheatov

6 ms·

1.
by dheatov 8d ago
They shouldn't and they won't. That will introduce a new metric -- %user disabling AI, and it will definitely be non-zero, which threatens the "everyone loves AI" narrative, which is the only thing thats floating all the
2.
by dheatov 29d ago
Now we fully understand the sustainable business model of Framework.
3.
by dheatov 1mo ago
All party in the deal understands this. They are just convinced they will no longer be around when things go wrong, hence won't be held accountable for this particular decision.
4.
by dheatov 4mo ago
Now Im suspecting if it's possible that VCs are part of the money loop, thus they are more than happy to fund as long as you pour enough of the funding back into the "AI ecosystem".
5.
by dheatov 4mo ago
They used SO many words to say so little thing. At this point it seems pretty safe to say Mythos is purely PR stunt.
6.
by dheatov 4mo ago
Why even rust at the first place? I dont see why we can't go straight from natural language -> Claude -> HTML/JS/CSS bundle. Instead of writing webpage, one can just write prompt for each page and serve it with claude.c
7.
by dheatov 4mo ago
I for one am REALLY GLAD to see it consumes itself.
8.
by dheatov 5mo ago
I did not see any based counterargument that addresses my concern.
9.
by dheatov 5mo ago
Thanks for pointing out. So close to buying it. Would appreciate more disclosure regarding the use of hostile technology.
10.
by dheatov 5mo ago
AI policy with AI usage is always difficult to write/read. Lengthy, frontloaded with excuses, values, and big words, followed by more words to fill the gap between sliced up ugly truth. AI policy without AI usage is easy to read and w
11.
by dheatov 6mo ago
However when improved tools are obtained by these capitalists whose business model has no hint of sustainability, what's next is a modern Phoebus cartel situation where further improvement will be restricted or even prohibited to fabri
12.
by dheatov 6mo ago
They don't really care or like what Astral is doing right now, but they have thoughts about what they can make Astral do for them, and they really fancy those thoughts.
13.
by dheatov 8mo ago
Assuming the actual price for many user is closer to 1k USD/mth than to 200 USD/mth, and the actual price is closer to their target margin to be a viable business, they're practically subsidising usage after 200 USD/mth.
14.
by dheatov 10mo ago
It's really impressive how powerful and efficient it has become. However, I find it so much more difficult to build mental model of it. I've been struggling with atomic and r/w barrier as there are sooo many ways the instruct
15.
by dheatov 10mo ago
The stochastic nature, minimal amount of care required to get something going, and the inefficiency, just to name a few.
16.
by dheatov 10mo ago
I doubt it's anywhere near million. Non-zero? Sure. But even for those scenario where "AI" helps, I still believe there exists other alternatives that doesn't consume unreasonable amount of energy and are not megacorp co
17.
by dheatov 10mo ago
Reminder that this is not the web we want.
18.
by dheatov 10mo ago
Seems like coudflare activated the maximum llm-scraper-bot-protection for everyone.
19.
by dheatov 10mo ago
Feel like IDA Pro counts.
20.
by dheatov 10mo ago
Less competent PMs are shoving capital A and capital I everywhere in panic mode, getting even more anxious as every failure exposes and deplatforms them even more. They couldve spent time to understand the problem domain and think more, if
21.
by dheatov 11mo ago
I feel like plagiarism is an appropriate analogy. Student can always argue they still learn something out of it and yada yada, and there's probably some truth in it. However, we still principally reject it in a pretty binary manner. I
22.
by dheatov 11mo ago
Position brought in to do "AI transformation" needs to deliver, and they have no way other than keep shoving it harder and harder. It's so much worse with decade old brands as most of us cant just not use it, and these min-ma
23.
by dheatov 1y ago
Extremely likely. Related news: https://focustaiwan.tw/society/202506120025
24.
by dheatov 1y ago
* Randomly load up previous chat as the default and just wait for bing pot. * "Tiny oopsie doopsie, our bad."
25.
by dheatov 1y ago
I believe its just marketing. The "AI" will ultimately be used as a Natural Language Calculator. IMO we will eventually give up trying to make calculator designs, plans, reviews and interprets. Things too good to be true will fade
26.
by dheatov 1y ago
I am anti-reading content generated by probabilistic model of human language, especially if published without much editing. Em-dash is a strong indicator of such.
27.
by dheatov 1y ago
Yea I missed that possibility. The race to establish authority is very much real.
28.
by dheatov 1y ago
Totally agree. This kind of disclaimer/disclosure with strong wording does not make sense for a product of for-profit company. You fix that before release, or you get it under control and disclose using a less emotional/dramatic w
29.
by dheatov 1y ago
Owh that's kinda cool, Ive never thought of that. Perhaps Im constrained by my thoughts, but I think for it to be practical it requires detecting driver's intention, which seems difficult to achieve by using only vehicular sensors
30.
by dheatov 1y ago
Sounds like a neat idea and potential fit with certain niche market. But I would be surprise if the answer is not just drive slower in most of the cases. In that case do you still want more specifics like brake timing? Optimal speed given c

More ›