deworms

7 ms·

1.
by deworms 4y ago
No they weren't able to generate the same existing code, both because that code is not included anywhere in the model, and because Copilot (not "Codepilot") has safeguards against this kind of situation, should it arise in th
2.
by deworms 4y ago
Yes it is, and I don't care about how popular my comments are. In many slavic countries antisemitism is the default and normal opinion. Semitic people are not the sacred cows they are in american culture.
3.
by deworms 4y ago
You can also just close the tab and stop reading. "Antisemitic" doesn't automatically mean "the devil" either.
4.
by deworms 4y ago
A simple search on github reveals that those functions were reposted verbatim thousands of times, most people just copy and paste snippets of code they find useful, ignoring licenses. This highlights how all the power a license promises to
5.
by deworms 4y ago
If you think most people pay any attention to licenses or respect them you better think again. Snippets get copied verbatim with no regard to their source all the time. Licenses have no power and are routinely ignored.
6.
by deworms 4y ago
Why would I waste time doing this?
7.
by deworms 4y ago
It prints this code because you have it open in another editor tab. Wish people who don't know at all how it works stopped acting all outraged when they're laughably wrong.
8.
by deworms 4y ago
For most commercial purposes screen readers can be safely ignored, they are not used by big spenders. Social share cards can be previewed readily and easily prepared without impacting the main content of the website.
9.
by deworms 4y ago
And - what's the point? Websites that want to track you will track you anyway, there's a whole array of technologies that will let them to, and won't display anything to you if you don't run JS. Security objections are p
10.
by deworms 4y ago
Purists who refuse to load websites with JS are such a small percentage of visitors they can be safely ignored. It's an uphill battle that they're losing very fast. I don't think you can use more than 5% of websites without J
11.
by deworms 4y ago
The point is that you're not supposed to receive the text by itself, the text is only there to entice you to visit the site, but you're supposed to click links, subscribe to the newsletter, get tracking scripts served to you, and
12.
by deworms 4y ago
>spraying an aerosol like sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere What happened to it being a toxic gas? And is this why they were pushing so hard to completely discredit the notion of "chemtrails" so that all criticism of this id
13.
by deworms 4y ago
Nice, very useful
14.
by deworms 4y ago
Publicly traded does not mean the same thing as being a public institution.
15.
by deworms 4y ago
As opposed to "legal annexation"? What does it matter what is "legal" in a war?
16.
by deworms 4y ago
Neither Meta nor Onlyfans are government organizations, they are privately owned and as such can make whatever deals they like. Calling a deal a "bribe" is just silly.
17.
The Wikimedia Foundation spends Wikipedia donations on political activism(twitter.com)
118 points by deworms 4y ago|43 comments
18.
Mariko Aoki Phenomenon(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by deworms 4y ago|0 comments
19.
by deworms 4y ago
Lol, social shaming, does it really work on anyone on the internet? How do you think this is going to age in 6 months?
20.
by deworms 4y ago
So in other words, by doing nothing in particular. A protest where you don't change your behavior in any way and don't have to bear any cost is not much of a protest.
21.
by deworms 4y ago
I don't think Ukraine acts like it's winning the war. Do winners desperately beg for support from NATO in a war they're winning? Do winners lose 20% of their territory to annexation?
22.
by deworms 4y ago
No, they didn't they still haven't restored service, and they cut it based on completely fake reports, without any warning or communication. They're not trustworthy.
23.
by deworms 4y ago
Something's broken with the design of the website, it looks zoomed in and zooming out doesn't even work.
24.
by deworms 4y ago
I remember the threads about StableDiffusion less than 4 weeks ago where people were confidently saying this kind of thing is 6 to 12 months away. Turns out it was a month. Singularity soon?
25.
by deworms 4y ago
I wouldn't use Cloudflare for deployments. They're known for arbitrarily taking over domains they manage and replacing their contents with their own PR pages with no advance warning. They're communicating with customers poor
26.
by deworms 4y ago
The article makes it sound as thought their own license forced them to release their own code. This could have only happened if the project had outside GPL'd code integrated into it, but then they wouldn't be able to legally chang
27.
by deworms 4y ago
I thought the post will somehow relate to AI art and how disfigured it is.
28.
by deworms 4y ago
If they're the authors of the code they didn't have to do anything they didn't want to.
29.
by deworms 4y ago
The bit about how GPL "forced" a company to release its own source code is obviously false. If you release your own software under the GPL, you can't be forced to do anything, this only applies if you integrate third party GP
30.
by deworms 4y ago
What's so special about games that makes it not useful? Python has it and it's bread and butter, and Godot language is basically a gimped, less expressive, and less useful knockoff of python

More ›