devrand

8 ms·

1.
by devrand 13d ago
All two letter TLDs are reserved for ccTLDs.
2.
by devrand 4mo ago
If you're using ACME to handle certificate rotation, can't you just configure multiple providers?
3.
by devrand 9mo ago
Is DOGE still there? The latest reporting [1] I've seen is that it's leaderless and has more or less just been absorbed into other organizations. This aligns with DOGE not posting anything for several months now. [1]: https:&#x2F
4.
by devrand 1y ago
It seems like you can also finance it interest free through Apple themselves without being locked to a carrier.
5.
by devrand 1y ago
What's the concern here? Can the phone not just be bought outright?
6.
by devrand 1y ago
This article links to a Forbes article that states it was a leak of a Saleforce instance that contained contact information about small and medium businesses. This PCWorld article seems to be taking that to mean that every single gmail acco
7.
by devrand 1y ago
You could also use the `_acme-challenge` CNAME record to delegate cert acquisition, assuming you're using separate subdomains for each.
8.
by devrand 1y ago
ah-ha! Didn't consider that GoDaddy operates the TLD (in my mind I assumed it was just Verisign). Thank you for pointing that out.
9.
by devrand 1y ago
Yeah I don't understand this. MarkMonitor themselves are a registry, so is the potentially a mistake in migrating from GoDaddy to MarkMonitor?
10.
by devrand 2y ago
Puget Systems has similar publications covering their experience building client systems, though not always in the same level of detail. They also have PugetBench to benchmark systems in real-world applications/workflows.
11.
by devrand 2y ago
It was dead long before Google was involved. Pebble filed for insolvency back in 2016 with Fitbit acquiring much of the assets. It was dead at this point. 5 years later Google bought Fitbit.
12.
by devrand 2y ago
I presume it's in a company's interest as L-1 visas cannot be transferred so you're tethered to them.
13.
by devrand 2y ago
Looks like WSJ finally implemented bot protection as archive.today just has a CAPTCHA archived.
14.
by devrand 2y ago
And the recent antitrust ruling against Google might see Mozilla lose like 80% of their revenue...
15.
by devrand 2y ago
I suggest you read the indictment for Megaupload (Wikipedia summarizes it, but they cite the actual document you can view): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megaupload_legal_case#Basis_of... The indictment explicitly answ
16.
by devrand 2y ago
Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viacom_International_Inc._v._Y... .
17.
by devrand 2y ago
At least in the short term they probably would. Why not take the basically free money? Longer term, yeah they'll probably just make their own search engine. I highly doubt Google would give Mozilla anything. The only reason I think the
18.
by devrand 2y ago
Presumably these deals with Google will be nullified, but can the various browsers just make new deals with someone else? Can Microsoft just just swoop in and make a deal with Apple/Mozilla/Samsung? Mozilla is going to be desperat
19.
by devrand 2y ago
It sounds like they intended to use it as the primary e-mail domain for himself and family. They claimed that they had already switched to using it. However, the total window of time here is small. They registered the domain in late Novembe
20.
by devrand 2y ago
I think they generally give a lot of weight to someone who registered the domain well ahead of the said company registering their mark. Though you might run into trouble if you started using the domain in bad-faith against that company (ex.
21.
by devrand 2y ago
That's one option. Alternatively, they could just delegate the _acme-challenge with a CNAME. If clientportal.somebank.com is actually run by somesaas.com, they can define CNAME _acme-challenge.clientportal.somebank.com --> [some_key
22.
by devrand 2y ago
Heck, subscribers could go to 10 day certs today (soon 7) and be immune from revocation entirely.
23.
by devrand 2y ago
I think they're suggesting that 1 year certificates are still at the point where people can just manually rotate them as they expire. If you keep reducing the lifespan, to say 90 days, that starts to tip the scale. You'll be spend
24.
by devrand 2y ago
"Never had to deal with 3rd party SaaS vendors certificate pinning requiring service tickets to change" I think this tends to fall into "probably shouldn't have been using Web PKI". I can't immediately think of
25.
by devrand 2y ago
Spoke too soon... seems like subscriber(s?) issued DigiCert a Temporary Restraining Order to not revoke: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1910322#c8 Bold.
26.
by devrand 2y ago
Respect to them for actually abiding by the BRs. Most CAs just shrug [1] and [2] say [3] it's [4] too [5] complicated [6], or just lie and claim planes will start crashing [7]. It's really disheartening that publicly trusted CAs j
27.
by devrand 2y ago
They’re saying that once you’ve sold certs to governments, distrusting that root will deny people access to government resources. They’re merely using “.gov” as a proxy for “some government”. Also roots can be TLD constrained, typically to
28.
by devrand 2y ago
It does seem like Netflix has been doing a decent cat-and-mouse game with Widevine for anything over 540p the last few months. There's been several shows that took several days to get properly copied (i.e. not just screen recorded).
29.
by devrand 2y ago
This is get first that I’m hearing that VAC is kernel level. Do you have a source for that?
30.
by devrand 3y ago
I agree, despite the fact that I use OTA TV. I would prefer to just get an internet stream, but I need to pay like $70/mo+ to get the content (plus a ton that I don't want), and it still has ads. I would be willing to pay a reason

More ›