devolving-dev

7 ms·

1.
by devolving-dev 8d ago
When autonomy is solved, they could put a bed or office or dining table in the car. But I agree, this halfway autonomy where you have to watch everything is kind of useless.
2.
by devolving-dev 10d ago
Like you said, I think skills are quickly subsumed by model abilities. I leave relevant notes about my own projects in agents.md and local comments around tricky bits of code that need them, but otherwise I just use vanilla codex.
3.
by devolving-dev 10d ago
I don't think Arabic script is that hard. It's nearly phonetic, unlike English. It's not super broad and hard to memorized like kanji. I don't know, maybe I'm just removed from the struggles of people learning it fo
4.
by devolving-dev 1mo ago
Models keep on improving though, so doesn't fine tuning become an ongoing task with ongoing maintenance burden?
5.
by devolving-dev 2mo ago
What's the benefit of SSEs here?
6.
by devolving-dev 2mo ago
I guess this ethics stuff is cool, but I'm more interested in how good it is at running a business and dealing with adversarial humans like in previous vending machine experiments. I hope they release something on that soon.
7.
by devolving-dev 3mo ago
You'll make more money when you downsize or move to a cheaper city or country for retirement if your house goes up in price. If you own a house in San Francisco you can sell, move to a vlcol city, buy a new house, invest the remainder,
8.
by devolving-dev 3mo ago
Is this a situation where AI will go away and we will regret the loss of skills? At worse, we will be forced to use open weight models instead of the cutting edge, so I don't think it's a big deal. I'm sure people got worse a
9.
by devolving-dev 3mo ago
He means that he's working 10 times faster so the manual things that he does once per task have to be done 10 times, and so he starts automating those too. I'm not claiming that he's actually 10x faster, just explaining. But
10.
by devolving-dev 3mo ago
I think that AI is here to stay, and that you should focus most of your efforts on the parts that AI can't do. It's like with calculators, you still know how to add and multiply and stuff, and such low level things are even more p
11.
by devolving-dev 3mo ago
Even if they don't benefit economically, there's some value in having them feel that they are valued and have a voice at the table. Such policies can provide the popular support needed to implement other more economically optimal
12.
by devolving-dev 3mo ago
People like to look at rent control from a purely economic lens, but the sociopolitical aspect must also be considered. A suboptimal economic outcome might actually be optimal when all factors are considered. Social harmony and a feeling of
13.
by devolving-dev 3mo ago
Right now, EVs are only good for people who have houses with garages that let them charge. If you need to use street parking or something then EVs don't work. But maybe if such technology improves everyone can use EVs.
14.
by devolving-dev 5mo ago
Yeah, also stuff like robotics which might not really exist today but could be big in the future.
15.
by devolving-dev 5mo ago
I wonder what this means for GLP 1 drugs that slow digestion.
16.
by devolving-dev 6mo ago
May I suggest an AI coparent? I'm half-joking, but theoretically AI should eventually be able to take your high level intent and use it to apply appropriate restrictions to your children's phones.
17.
by devolving-dev 7mo ago
I've always wondered if Tesla's issues with FSD were a sensor problem or an intelligence problem. I think Tesla's claim is that when they look at accident footage, it is clear to a human how the car could have avoided the acc
18.
by devolving-dev 8mo ago
It's just in my personal experience, I ask AI to help me and it seems to do it's best. Sometimes it fails because it's incapable. It's similar to an employee in that regard. Whereas when I install a computer virus it ins
19.
by devolving-dev 8mo ago
Whether driven by fear or by their model weights or whatever, I don't think that the likelihood of an AI agent, at least the current ones like Claude and Codex, acting maliciously to harm my systems is much different than the risk of a
20.
by devolving-dev 8mo ago
Don't you have the same issue when you hire an employee and give them access to your systems? If the AI seems capable of avoiding harm and motivated to avoid harm, then the risk of giving it access is probably not greater than the expe
21.
by devolving-dev 11mo ago
I've never really been convinced that robots or AI replacing humans is a real problem. Because why would they do that? If I had an army of super intelligent robots, I would have them waiting on me and fulfilling my every whim. I wouldn