devhinton

6 ms·

1.
by devhinton 12y ago
This is a good writeup but I have to say: "We really can do anything. The sky is not the limit in Cosmos. We can go beyond into outer space." *pukes Good article so far, but that line smh
2.
by devhinton 12y ago
Why is this up-voted? This is basically don't be a dumb-ass 101
3.
by devhinton 13y ago
Any one else notice the self-justification of the comments? > Cherrypicking. A great majority of startups fail and their ideas are proven as unworkable or impractical, so it is not unreasonable to summarily dismiss most of them. Clearly
4.
by devhinton 13y ago
This was not brought up but is relevant when a lot of discussion on this article is revolving around the business-developer relationship. >Selling people mediocre products they don't need and probably can't afford, that is actu
5.
by devhinton 13y ago
It is true a team ideally is made up of experts in different areas. It is true having technical skills can make it easier to hire developers, get customers (only one way to make this easier), and appreciate the technical side. If a 'de
6.
by devhinton 13y ago
If any of the subsequent logic is flawed I'm very open to conceding points based on logically rebuttals. Aside: This community is awesome, so much respect for this intelligent lengthy, conversation. It seems 'regulated' vs. &
7.
by devhinton 13y ago
Could you explain this a bit more and what you mean by 'self-promotion'? 1) If you are defining self-promotion as 'falsely giving the impression of ability or productivity' then it seems hurtful to any company (I hate se
8.
by devhinton 13y ago
You may intend differently but this sounds incredibly passive. And is deleterious to change. Revolutions like the main stream popularization of the computer or the rapid boom of the iphone seem to 'just happen'. But this obscures
9.
by devhinton 13y ago
haha impressively well
10.
by devhinton 13y ago
What you say the article is missing is the whole point of the post. This is not a programmer way of looking at it on the whole. In fact, I think the goal of this post is to change programmers "way of looking at it'". 'th
11.
by devhinton 13y ago
This is great. I am just jumping into open source from an academic background. I had assumed that open source was great for directly practical website creating and hosting (back-end, client side etc...) but weaker in terms of learning for O
12.
by devhinton 13y ago
Wow, awesome discussion. Thanks for the original comment phwd. And for the add-ons pxtl & danso. All of your thoughts made me refine and further back my own. Though I agree there is a two sided ownership (both friends own a 'side&#
13.
by devhinton 13y ago
Yes. That is true. You are right.
14.
by devhinton 13y ago
Maybe I'm ignorant but $200 a year is not that much money. Considering a software engineer is usually paid 70k a year and you have four engineers you are looking at this being .071428571 % of total cost. So ummmmm maybe minimize your c
15.
by devhinton 13y ago
Second paragraph, "One", not "On". Not trying to be a jerk but that is a bit sloppy :) EDITED: Also, unless I'm wrong equivalently comparably small errors in code are what allows for security loop holes cough cou
16.
by devhinton 13y ago
On further reflection, It is also true that reactive does not have any support for collections or scoping. Reactive seems to take a view-centric approach while EndDash takes a template-centric approach. To us, the later seems more logical,
17.
by devhinton 13y ago
Agreed, thanks for the feedback, and, after having worked with end-dash I've come to a lot of the same conclusions you just made. The dashes were initially just to shorten the common: <div class="thing" data-text="thi
18.
by devhinton 13y ago
We prefer to have the values only defined in one place. In Epoxy.js, looking at the getting started example, it appears the value firstName is indicated both in the JS and in the HTML. In EndDash, this would only need to be done in the HTML