describe24

4 ms·

1.
by describe24 6y ago
I don't think it's bad, I included it to further point out that her resignation wasn't the result of just one person deciding they would prefer she left. But that multiple people agreed that it would be best to accept her res
2.
by describe24 6y ago
I think a number of people have mentioned it but I don't think Google let her go because of either her email or paper. Her email alludes to there being tensions already present between her and her superiors for at least a year. It soun
3.
by describe24 6y ago
Most people aren't responding because they're defending the actions of a "large corporate entity". They're relating to the people, such as Jeff Dean, that made that decision. A decision that definitely wasn't t
4.
by describe24 6y ago
Nobody has set the bar that high. Many people are just expecting basic civility. We all have to deal with issues yet not everyone turns to being hostile at every beat. It's not a once off Tweet for her, I think more would be forgiving
5.
by describe24 6y ago
A lot of ethicists on twitter today saying they thought Google was ethical because of one person. Which is just wild
6.
by describe24 6y ago
I actually find it quite unethical and potentially rather manipulative to share with your future employees that you fought tooth and nail for them. Essentially implying that they wouldn't be there if it weren't for you and immedia
7.
by describe24 6y ago
Argh, it's been archived already :(
8.
by describe24 6y ago
She was in a position of privilege to hire people. Did she hire any black women or men to help with the lack of diversity she refers to?