derjdoj

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by derjdoj 5y ago

   Makes perfect sense, I thought so as well. It just made me think hope somebody doesn't assume this would be the best name in this case :)
2. 2.▲
   by derjdoj 5y ago

   For instance, as in the article, provide the examples so that the users have more heads-up as in what is actually happening. Long term, you might deprecate it and solve the problem with more intuitive abstraction.
3. 3.▲
   by derjdoj 5y ago

   I did’n quite intended to sound as if I think it would be unacceptable but the method name sounded too comical to me to be honest. Almost as if the intention is to say this method is a bit of a joke don’t use it please. Maybe move() might w
4. 4.▲
   by derjdoj 5y ago

   Please don’t have a method named plusIshRoundCeiling() in a library that “might” be used for years in lots of projects :) The plus() one is almost there and you can easily explain the ugly bits in javadocs (with lots of warnings around it s