derekbsnider

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by derekbsnider 2mo ago

   While I expect that a language specifically for LLMs would not be a terrible idea, I think what is actually needed is a different interface for LLMs to use. Currently Claude Code and Codex are primarily interfacing with code directly mostly
2. 2.▲
   by derekbsnider 2mo ago

   I'm actually working on one... well, it's a lot more than a C++ to C transpiler, but it's just one of the features it contains. It's actually a C/C++ derived language which currently aims to fully support C23 and C+
3. 3.▲
   by derekbsnider 2mo ago

   So this makes me think that a "better" idea is let C be the actual underlying foundation for all of these languages because most languages are written in C (and C++) in the first place, so instead of forcing this strict divide, wh
4. 4.▲
   by derekbsnider 2mo ago

   Oh wow, interesting project... I've also been working on a "better c" for a few years, and while it was originally a JIT language (using jitasm), I recently switch to MIR, but since I already had my own lexer/parser&#x2F