denschub

6 ms·

1.
by denschub 2y ago
Here's something for the next time you want to "expose" a phony: before linking me to your investigative source, ask for exact date-stamps when I made changes to the robots.txt and what I did, as well as when I blocked IPs. I
2.
by denschub 2y ago
just for you, I redeployed the old robots.txt (with an additional log-honeypot). I even manually submitted it to the web archive just now so you have something to look at: https://web.archive.org/web/20241231041718&#x2F
3.
by denschub 2y ago
notice how there's a period of almost two months with no new index, just until a week before I posted this? I wonder what might have caused this!!1 (and it's not like they only check robots.txt once a month or so. https:/&#x
4.
by denschub 2y ago
the robots.txt on the wiki is no longer what it was when the bot accessed it. primarily because I clean up my stuff afterwards, and the history is now completely inaccessible to non-authenticated users, so there's no need to maintain m
5.
by denschub 2y ago
> Is it all crawlers that switch to a non-bot UA I've observed only one of them do this with high confidence. > how are they determining it's the same bot? it's fairly easy to determine that it's the same bot, bec
6.
by denschub 2y ago
What's the actual issue you're facing? I just tested the Stripe Dashboard in Firefox, and everything works fine.
7.
by denschub 2y ago
"I'm in Europe so I don't have to care because software patents are not enforceable here" isn't the solution. Yes, patent law doesn't apply - but copyright law does, and they very much can take down content tha
8.
by denschub 2y ago
The page you linked to has a FAQ section. > Q: Is membership in the Thread Group alone, at any membership level, sufficient to gain and receive royalty-free intellectual property rights (IPR) for Thread technology? A: No, membership at a
9.
by denschub 2y ago
It's baffling that some people here can read a sentence like > Membership in Thread Group is necessary to implement, practice, and ship Thread technology and Thread Group specifications. And somehow think that the restrictions only
10.
by denschub 2y ago
> I'm sure Thread Group would love to stop Google making OpenThread available Google is a founding member of the Thread Group. OpenThread exists publicly because it's the only widely available implementation that's shipped
11.
by denschub 2y ago
This is not what the license says.
12.
by denschub 2y ago
Here are the full texts of both emails I sent them: https://overengineer.dev/txt/2024-05-11-thread-group-emails/ The second one to their press team sounds super presumptuous, sorry for that, but I found that you k
13.
by denschub 2y ago
This is the reason why this notice exists in the OpenThread repo: https://github.com/openthread/openthread/blob/1fceb225b3858a...
14.
by denschub 2y ago
Lawyers have little issue defining blogs like mine as "with commercial interest". I have a side-business, so lawyers could make the argument that I use my blog as advertising. I have a Ko-Fi link in the bottom of one specific site
15.
by denschub 3y ago
This issue was caused by Google on their server-side, without any relation to a change in Firefox, so I'm not sure why you feel the need to yell at my Mozilla-colleague.
16.
by denschub 3y ago
You are 100% correct in your assumptions. This isn't my first incident, and it won't be my last. As much as some folks here want to call me an asshole for that, we have a very good understanding of how this ends if we don't l
17.
by denschub 6y ago
That was a limited time experiment, which got shut down after it didn't prove very successful. But from that, it's probably a fair guess that it would not perform well if rolled out again today. There are a few very vocal people w
18.
by denschub 6y ago
Exactly this has been attempted for a limited time in 2018, https://hacks.mozilla.org/2018/10/a-new-way-to-support-mdn/ , and pretty much nobody actually paid.
19.
by denschub 6y ago
Hey there, Mozilla employee here. I just looked at https://www.spotify.com/us/account/profile/ in my Firefox and it appears to be working just fine. Could you explain what's going wrong for you? What kin
20.
by denschub 7y ago
That's amazing that you can do that. Anonymous credit cards are ruled out by law basically everywhere in the European Union. Assuming that I live in the US, and that everyone on this planets is doing so, is - as you call it - incredibl
21.
by denschub 7y ago
Tor, originally from "The Onion Router", works by routing your traffic through multiple Tor nodes. Like an onion, each node only peels off one layer and passes the packet on to whoever is addressed on that layer. Each node only kn
22.
by denschub 7y ago
It's called Tor. And you don't even need a subscription for that.
23.
by denschub 7y ago
We also have multiple documented cases of "no-log VPNs" submitting their logs to law enforcement. I even linked to one case in my post. What's your point here, exactly? Because my point was you have to trust either party. Oh,
24.
VPN – Very Precarious Narrative(schub.io)
462 points by denschub 7y ago|274 comments
25.
European Copyright Reform: Article 13 puts alternative social networks at risk(blog.diasporafoundation.org)
2 points by denschub 8y ago|0 comments
26.
The Web is still a Darpa weapon(medium.com)
4 points by denschub 8y ago|0 comments
27.
Contributor engagement vs. Contributor's engagement(schub.io)
1 points by denschub 9y ago|0 comments
28.
by denschub 9y ago
We have fun. ;)
29.
by denschub 11y ago
we're doing pretty fine, thanks!
30.
by denschub 11y ago
Why. Just... why?

More ›