deltathreetwo

5 ms·

1.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
I find this post hilarious. You're trying to juggle an idea that is in itself paradoxical and illogical. The idea that all forms of discrimination are bad. Hear me out. All discrimination is bad including cultural discrimination. Howev
2.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
See this garbage comment is the rudest comment of all. Insulting beyond anything I've ever seen. You are literally backstabbing me, spreading lies and telling people to ignore me? Please stop.
3.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
It doesn't have to be a rich guy. But some form of centralized rich power. Like a corporation for example. But even complex structures like this involve a cluster of individuals who own the corporation or have seats of power within the
4.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
It was the intention. You are lying to my face. The format: "News Flash: Statement of something obvious." is very rude. Implying I don't know the obvious thing. I hold no grudges but your previous statement is a total lie. Do
5.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
In English science exclusively refers to science as Wikipedia defined it. Formal science is a rarely used term. In fact much of the (English) academic world doesn't consider logic, math, or computer science to be actual sciences. The t
6.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
Doesn't matter. It's true and what you said how it's "always the case" is categorically false. The falsehood of your comment is the only thing that is relevant here.
7.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
epgui doesn't know what he's talking about. Science in it's purest form can only falsify things. Absolutely nothing can be proven correct. There is no "pure" science. That's garbage. What's going on is epg
8.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
It is always the case. Another fallacy that can only be the result of your flawed intuition. All human capability has limits. You have limited strength and limited intelligence. There is no amount of intelligence or physical strength in a s
9.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
There are proven instances where systems such as this can remain stable. Slavery is one. There are tons and tons of other systems throughout human history where massive inequality remains stable. In fact inequality is the bedrock of civiliz
10.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
What is programming not related to? Seriously a huge portion of posts here are just about programming analogies.
11.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
Free will lies at the particle level. If atoms are defined by strict physical rules that are deterministic and have no free will then if our brains are made of of the same atoms does that mean our brains are also defined by the same strict
12.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
>Given that the universe is eventually inconsistent, I don't think this has been observed to be true yet. At least not true within a framework of very specific theoretical rules. Otherwise all our science and logic is useless.
13.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
Lying to oneself and exposing the complete truth are two alternative strategies towards survival. That is why some people have brains that lie to them less then others, while others have brains that lie more. You will find different degrees
14.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
The iphone was at one point in time the same innovation as this and at that time there were plenty of people like you calling it an "obvious" failure. At the time people were talking about how hard and clumsy it was to type on and
15.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
Just make a whole new thing. Html and css are technologies with decades of technical debt. Like a remake of a movie, we are long overdue.
16.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
The churn is the result of the fact that we don't understand what is optimal. We know how to optimize for things like the shortest distance between two points but we don't understand how to optimize Software Design or even GUI. Th
17.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
Why not just use the layman terms. Science and logic. The terms derived from philosophy are the most snobbish in my opinion. Additionally Logic and science formalize these concepts, Epistemology on the other hand has a lot of qualitative mu
18.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
There is no word. The concept exists because of the word. Typically words exist to describe a concept, but in this case it's the other way around. The concept would not have otherwise existed if it were not because of the word. Therefo
19.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
It's an issue with english vocabulary. Nobody fully agrees on a definition of sentience. Don't get tricked into thinking it's profound. You simply have a loaded word that's ambiguously defined. You have a collection of a
20.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
Another thing to consider is that "sentience" is a loaded word. You're all just arguing over vocabulary and the definition of a word. Simply put, sentience is just a combination of thousands attributes such that if something
21.
by deltathreetwo 4y ago
Entropy is a consequence of probability. Which means that it can actually decrease without an energy input. There's just a very low probability of it happening but it CAN happen. It's a misnomer to call those things laws of thermo