deltastone

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by deltastone 7mo ago

   I would agree normally, but this one is a nice change and upgrade, actually.
2. 2.▲
   by deltastone 8mo ago

   This here is true. 5th amendment protections only protect you from SELF-incrimination, and in some ways, your spouse. It does not apply to protecting others. Though some have tried arguing that they are protecting themselves, which then req
3. 3.▲
   by deltastone 8mo ago

   This has been known for a while, though I don't know if your typical layperson was aware until recently. People need to remember that any access a company has to a device, so does LE with a warrant. Even moreso once you get into federa
4. 4.▲
   by deltastone 8mo ago

   Bitlocker isn't secure, for several reasons, that I won't get into on here.
5. 5.▲
   by deltastone 8mo ago

   Also, using biometrics on a device, and your biometrics unlock said device, do wonders for proving to a jury that you owned and operated that device. So you're double screwed in that regard.
6. 6.▲
   by deltastone 8mo ago

   It's something you know vs. something you have. That's how the legal system sees it. You might not tell someone the pin to your safe, but if police find the key to it, or hire a locksmith to drill out your safe, it's theirs w