deltaoneseven

8 ms·

1.
by deltaoneseven 4y ago
> No, I'm not an x-ray operator, but I work in health care and have good knowledge of what it costs to run a hospital in America. That's the key word. "In America," and nowhere else on the face of the entire earth. Yo
2.
by deltaoneseven 4y ago
Not worked up. Just stating the facts. Don't understand how his twitter invalidates the fact?
3.
by deltaoneseven 4y ago
No exact answers exist but probabilities are very real. 3 people being simultaneously not fit for the job is quite unlikely. You have a choice here. Either 1 person is unfit for the job or 3 people. 1 person being unfit though not for sure
4.
by deltaoneseven 4y ago
The first thing wrong with the system is that number. 69k. Even if nobody paid 69k. Who made up that BS number and for what insidious purpose?
5.
by deltaoneseven 4y ago
I know dog shit isn't worth 69k and nobody needs to acquire a dog shit maker, and operate a dog shit maker nor pay for the staff making a dog shit maker to know that dog shit isn't worth 69k. Basic common sense. Maybe the above is
6.
by deltaoneseven 5y ago
I have been a manager and I've realized that a huge portion of it is a communication problem. Not all of it but a big portion of it and not many managers realize this. When I was a new manager I noticed an employee that would just get
7.
by deltaoneseven 5y ago
This is really vile. You realize the what you're doing to someone when you fire them? Personally I think people with your style of personality aren't suited to be managers. To the other replier: it's definitely not sarcasm.
8.
by deltaoneseven 5y ago
No there are alternatives. You support the team switch before termination. Termination is a last resort option and should only be done after multiple people managed the person directly to remove bias. I've seen a scenario where 2 peopl
9.
by deltaoneseven 5y ago
This is done because when employees are let go they could become potentially hostile to the company. That's why they don't inform people beforehand of the firing. What should absolutely be done is inform him of the exact performan
10.
by deltaoneseven 5y ago
This. Getting fired is largely a perception thing as much as it is performance. How your manager perceives you and his ability to perceive things and his personality influences everything.
11.
by deltaoneseven 5y ago
The article fails to address when the firing is actually wrong and incorrect. I work at anduril and I know of a new manager who 6 months into the job fired 2 people and had one person quit because he couldn't handle dealing with him. T
12.
by deltaoneseven 5y ago
The author is a female with chosen gender of male. Its actually even worse if he was a man. He's a man attacking men and overreacting to something that obviously was much less likely to be a threat. Its a man touching another dudes sho
13.
by deltaoneseven 5y ago
Agreed, but I would go further to say that the type system and immutability helps in the area you describe as well: "or where you failed to predict some sequence of actions and account for it correctly." Basically immutability ser
14.
by deltaoneseven 5y ago
Believe it or not the language you use influences the amount of bugs in the system. Also your programming technique and style of programming influences the amount of bugs. Generally to reduce bugs, go with a functional programming style and
15.
by deltaoneseven 5y ago
It's talking about idealistic foundations. The idea that software being a theoretical language with a well defined domain and codomain can be written with zero bugs and zero testing to catch those bugs. Zero bug code is written utilizi
16.
by deltaoneseven 5y ago
I don't see his way of viewing numbers as particularly efficient. It's very inn-efficient. It's an anomaly for sure but I would hesitate to call it a talent or super human ability. I would argue his way of thinking of numbers