dejan

6 ms·

1.
by dejan 2y ago
I think you are misreading my comment: they are the threat actor themselves, tricking users in believing they are better off via Proton. SMTP does not encrypt messages and they arrive at Proton's inbound relays unencrypted, are scanned
2.
by dejan 2y ago
end-to-end encryption? yes, if both users are on Proton - but don't call it email then. Storing encrypted makes only sense when keys are not in their hands. Plaintext password enters their system on each login which means they can have
3.
by dejan 2y ago
just forwarding is great if you can afford losing mail. Gmail will drop your messages occasionally. You can use gmail's own relay for sending but it won't DKIM sign which is a must even for Gmail itself. for a more reliable soluti
4.
by dejan 2y ago
hmm, at that price you could try https://migadu.com
5.
by dejan 3y ago
I think you're reading that wrong. It's an issue with the protocol. IMAP/SMTP as implemented in most clients do not support 2FA. You can add 2FA on your own on the webmail, but you could still circumvent it by using the pro
6.
by dejan 3y ago
Why?
7.
by dejan 3y ago
Try https://gmailify.com so you can add domains to your Gmail account.
8.
by dejan 3y ago
You could also stick with free Gmail accounts and add on top all addresses and domains you need via gmailify.com[1] for flat $6 per year. It's custom domains extensions for Gmail with own dedicated relays. [1] https://www.gm
9.
by dejan 3y ago
If you are just doing cold mailing on one-to-one basis, you can use migadu.com for it. Everyone has to do that at some point and it is not spam. 500 mails is not a lot. Just cap it daily to e.g. 50-100 or you could hurt your own domain repu
10.
by dejan 3y ago
It is Gmailify serving the "unlimited", not Google. No ToS violation - not using Google's APIs. Gmailify is an extension of existing features of Gmail. Many Gmail users already do this, but through a complete service like Fas
11.
Show HN: Unlimited email addresses on your domain, with Gmail(gmailify.com)
3 points by dejan 3y ago|2 comments
12.
by dejan 3y ago
It was useful during development.
13.
by dejan 3y ago
Thank you for your comment. The service did not exist in December :)
14.
by dejan 3y ago
Thank you for the comment and typo correction! Fixed. > Allowing multiple customers to send mail from the same IP seemed too risky. There are two sides of this problem. Sending very little traffic from an IP can also have negative effect
15.
Custom domains with @gmail.com addresses(gmailify.com)
2 points by dejan 3y ago|4 comments
16.
Show HN: Gmailify.com extends Gmail with custom domains(gmailify.com)
3 points by dejan 3y ago|2 comments
17.
by dejan 4y ago
You can ask us directly such questions. When we started, we were unsure how to cover the costs of the free tier which were becoming steep. One of the ideas was to allow internal advertising of paid users towards the free users for their pro
18.
by dejan 4y ago
Our infrastructure is split among several datacenters. We utilize also multliple datacenters within individual regions. In case of a complete datacenter disaster as it has happened in Strasbourg, we'd be minimally affected with possibl
19.
by dejan 4y ago
That is not quite fair; even though we did raise prices, we informed twice in an announcement to all users months before it happened giving opportunity to act upon it. We have also grandfathered old pricing for an additional year to all use
20.
by dejan 4y ago
We could all bake our own bread at home, but very few do. It boils down to convenience and time best spent. By all means, I would recommend [5] if you have the technical knowledge to run it. This will give you more insight and appreciation
21.
by dejan 4y ago
Forwarding will always be unreliable, regardless of which service you use. Gmail has POP3 fetching feature for a reason, so people would forward less. Disliking the answer does not make it incorrect. =)
22.
by dejan 4y ago
Dejan from Migadu here. >Hate speech, racism, calls for violence, Nazism as well any other immoral, unethical or socially unacceptable activity will be denied service. If illegal, we will report such to the authorities. That is not refer
23.
by dejan 5y ago
try migadu.com
24.
by dejan 6y ago
Seen it :) The notice was actually given in early August, and the change took effect in October. We have extended trial to all that asked for it without problems. We did say in the update what happened. The lowest paid plan has only limitat
25.
by dejan 6y ago
Pandemic hit everyone, including us, that is why we cannot afford to subsidize free users anymore. The new paid tier is ~$1.6 monthly or about 5 cents a day, which is affordable in every corner of the planet. We also never refused to help t
26.
by dejan 6y ago
> I don't like such tone. Corrected, not intention to make a "tone", just pointing out that information is intentionally omitted. > Its perfectly possible to get IMAP to work with TOTP Yes, but that's not available
27.
by dejan 6y ago
Posteo is not very transparent there. They do not mention SMTP/IMAP/POP access on their 2FA docs. 2FA is not supported by any email client for generic IMAP/POP/SMTP[1]. Just think of that experience, providing a token on
28.
by dejan 6y ago
The control panel does have 2FA via TOTP and Yubikey already. Webauthn is coming. We're working on a solution for the mailbox 2FA, hence the (yet).
29.
by dejan 6y ago
No risk of flamewar, I genuinely want to know your view, not defend ourselves in public. If we messed up, knowing where and how helps not to repeat it. I agree we could have done that better, however an announcement was made via email and s
30.
by dejan 6y ago
Thank you for your criticism here (offtopic though), but we have never had an outage where mail was lost. Where did that comment come from? I am sorry for that bitterness, but I don't think we deserve it. I rather think the issue her

More ›