deisteve

13 ms·

1.
by deisteve 2y ago
same i have the whole series on CD
2.
by deisteve 2y ago
coalition makes it sound like its in the millions all coordinating together like these guys : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite
3.
by deisteve 2y ago
There's a term to describe this: creative destruction, literally. We are at the cusp of a full scale commoditization stage of generative AI that will impact all aspects of the creative/software fields. If you want to know what thi
4.
by deisteve 2y ago
I'm not so sure how much that is relevant to Meta Movie Gen. I've tried all the tools: Luma, Runway, Kling Luma is by far the worst and relatively compared to Runway and Kling by far produces the worst quality and unstable video.
5.
by deisteve 2y ago
$157B marketcap means they need to 20x their current revenue of roughly 400 million dollars by next year... But the revenue has flatlined and you can't raise your existing users cost by 20x... It truly is a mystery as to how anybody th
6.
by deisteve 2y ago
is there anything that runs on WASM for scraping? the issue is that you need to enable flags and turn off other security features to scrape on your web browser and this is why its not popular but with WASM that might change
7.
by deisteve 2y ago
Never heard of Ace but in grade 3 iq of 137 in south africa im not satisfied honestly still feel like im in my 20s
8.
by deisteve 2y ago
its honestly overhanded unless you work in sensitive positions nobody gives a f about you
9.
by deisteve 2y ago
this is exactly why i dont want to meet hn'ers
10.
by deisteve 2y ago
what game has she made
11.
by deisteve 2y ago
this is why i became skeptical of openai's claims if they shared the COT the grift wont work its just RL
12.
by deisteve 2y ago
yes 20mg to 1000mg sometimes (high tolerance and i dont ant to repeat that)
13.
by deisteve 2y ago
in a region with tsunamis and earthquakes and world's 2nd largest military looking to invade the island? i think Samsung is in a far better environment. if Warren Buffet dumps his TSMC shares then we can't ignore these real risks
14.
by deisteve 2y ago
Call me conspiratorial but feels like TSMC is the target for both China and US. China needs TSMC to have economic and political leverage. US wants TSMC to become an American owned enterprise so it can prop up Intel. South Korea or Samsung r
15.
by deisteve 2y ago
so i've had some chance to look at different people trying out o1 and heres my take: its largely hype with some interesting moments First they used it to compare it to gpt4o not gpt4. Second the benchmark they used for coding is iffy s
16.
by deisteve 2y ago
i've written an implementation on postgresql you can use it like this: SELECT * FROM check_rate_limit('client1', 1.0, 10.0, INTERVAL '1 minute'); -- Create a table to store client rate limiting data CREATE
17.
by deisteve 2y ago
similar but for me and this only happens after I've taken large amount of edibles before falling asleep instead of a large bomb I hear a loud scream in my head usually when i have to be awakened due to urge to urinate i now avoid takin
18.
by deisteve 2y ago
i think you are right now actually initially i got excited but now i think OpenAI pulled the hype card again to seem relevant as they struggle to be profitable Claude on the other hand has been fantastic and seems to do similar reasoning be
19.
by deisteve 2y ago
while i was initially excited now im having second thoughts after seeing the experiments run by people in the comments here on X I see a totally different energy more about hyping it on HN I see reserved and collected take which I trust mor
20.
by deisteve 2y ago
currently my workflow is generate some code, run it, if it doesn't run i tell LLM what I expected, it will then produce code and I frequently tell it how to reason about the problem. with O1 being in the 89th percentile would mean it s
21.
by deisteve 2y ago
ive known a few billionaires and the way they see their wealth is very peculiar. they view their net worth as something that generates cash flow and will never ever touch that principal. so they end up having to work still even after becomi
22.
by deisteve 2y ago
you are right i read the charts wrong. O1 has significant lead over GPT-4o in the zero shot examples honestly im spooked
23.
by deisteve 2y ago
ah i see so you're saying that LLM-written code is already showing signs of being a maintenance nightmare, and that's a reason to be skeptical about its adoption. But isn't that just a classic case of 'we've always
24.
by deisteve 2y ago
same...but have you considered the broader implications of relying on LLMs to generate code? It's not just about being a 'force accelerator' for individual programmers, but also about the potential impact on the industry as a
25.
by deisteve 2y ago
'Not useful' is a pretty low bar to clear, especially when you consider the state of the art just 5 years ago. LLMs may not be solving world hunger, but they're already being used in production for coding If you're not s
26.
by deisteve 2y ago
so o1 seems like it has real measurable edge, crushing it in every single metric, i mean 1673 elo is insane, and 89th percentile is like a whole different league, and it looks like it's not just a one off either, it's consistently
27.
by deisteve 2y ago
yeah this is kinda cool i guess but 808 elo is still pretty bad for a model that can supposedly code like a human, i mean 11th percentile is like barely scraping by, and what even is the point of simulating codeforces if youre just gonna ma
28.
by deisteve 2y ago
yeah thats probly right, inner parts of forest would be cleaner air wise dust gets trapped on leaves and stuff but sunlight is probly a bigger issue, less of it gets thru all the dust and thats bad for plants and animals alike, especially o
29.
by deisteve 2y ago
i just read this paper on arxiv and im still trying to wrap my head around the implications so the authors got over 100 nlp researchers to write down novel research ideas and then had them review ideas generated by a large language model (l
30.
by deisteve 2y ago
you're advocating for a proactive approach to emotions, where we acknowledge and rationalize them to prevent irrational responses, while still allowing ourselves to feel and work through rational emotions. This approach seems to strike

More ›