deeviant

6 ms·

1.
by deeviant 29d ago
Then again, if the only thing the human doing is bitching about AI use, it's not really that comparatively useful.
2.
by deeviant 1mo ago
It's a huge problem, it's just not a problem to economic model, but the ecological one.
3.
by deeviant 1mo ago
Yeah if you are trying to manually validate a firehouse of agent commands you are already losing before you started... You sandbox, you have good checkpoints, and good agents, that's it. If you are manually reviewing commands you are
4.
by deeviant 1mo ago
I think it's just more about market incentive. At it's core, LLMs are bad for google's previous business model, which was to send you to as many sites 'good enough' for what you were looking for and plant Ad land mi
5.
by deeviant 1mo ago
LLM coding isn't even close to plateauing. Right now, the major players are in a consolidation step, focusing more on economic efficiency but still not at the point where we're ready to start burning models to hardware and freezin
6.
by deeviant 4mo ago
Have you people ever read human generated code? Good grief, you act the like human code is not a disaster 9 times out of 10.
7.
by deeviant 5mo ago
It's quite bad at role play in my (rather large) experience. I have AI play 3 characters in my groups D&D campaign, it doesn't follow instructions well and it's prose, from a creative standpoint, doesn't hold a candl
8.
by deeviant 5mo ago
It's more like saying, "and you may now only use the Porsche for 5 minutes out of every day."
9.
by deeviant 5mo ago
There are ~7 born per minute. 95% of them are retail investors. If you want actual reason, it's because he uses it as a money battery, i.e. funding xAI and SPACE DATA CENTERS.
10.
by deeviant 7mo ago
The surprising thing here is that anybody would ever think it was random. Did they not notice the LLM reusing the same names over and over again too. However, "make my a python script the generates a random password" works. Skil
11.
by deeviant 7mo ago
Projects that deny AI contribution will simply disappear when an agent can reproduce their entire tech stack in a single prompt within a couple years. (not there yet, but the writing is on the wall at this point). Whatever the right respons
12.
by deeviant 7mo ago
> It was drawing on what gets engagement I do not think LLMs optimize for 'engagement', corporations do, but LLMs optimize on statistical convergence, I don't find that that results in engagement focus, your opinion my v
13.
by deeviant 7mo ago
I have problem pulled out postgres 10 or more times for various projects at work. Each time I had to fight for it, each time I won, it did absolute everything I needed it to do and did it well.
14.
by deeviant 8mo ago
I can't imagine why you would want a job processing framework linked to a single thread, which make this seem like a paid-version-only product. What does it have over Celery?
15.
by deeviant 10mo ago
RTX pro does not have NV-link, because money, however. Otherwise, people might not have to drop 40,000 for true inference GPU.
16.
by deeviant 11mo ago
Basically just rules/workflows from cursor/windsurf, but with a UI.
17.
by deeviant 1y ago
And the risks are infinitesimally smaller.
18.
by deeviant 1y ago
I don't understand these posts. Do people not understand how venture capital works? The majority of these companies know they are burning money, but more than that knew they would be losing money at this point and beyond. That is the
19.
by deeviant 1y ago
I wish somebody would make a browser add-on that automatically filters all "high temperature superconductor" news that's below 100C.
20.
by deeviant 1y ago
My buddy was absolutely delighted by Sunshine+Moonlight and basically forced me to try it. Long story short, it is not nearly as responsive for dev tasks, amazing for gamings or streaming, however.
21.
by deeviant 2y ago
> Some people might not enjoy writing their own code. If that’s the case, as harsh as it may seem, I would say that they’re trying to work in a field that isn’t for them Conversely: Some people want to insist that writing code 10x slower
22.
by deeviant 2y ago
Cost per flight hour doesn't make nearly as much sense to focus on as you think it does in an active war.
23.
by deeviant 2y ago
Current US Administration: How dare request security guarantees and point out Russia breaks their word more often then not! Average US Administration supporter: The US didn't give Ukraine security guarantees in the Budapest Memorandum,
24.
by deeviant 2y ago
They are not low cost, they cost nearly as much as an F35.
25.
by deeviant 2y ago
That is incorrect, standard Single-issue tunnel vision (which is very much promoted by Russian propaganda). NATO, with America leading, gave the world the longest stretch of relative peace it has ever seen. The next 80 years will not be t
26.
by deeviant 2y ago
The later.
27.
by deeviant 2y ago
So that's a no?
28.
by deeviant 2y ago
Can you point out where I made that claim?
29.
by deeviant 2y ago
You talk about lazy and emotional, but your response feels like it is both of those. Also, you sound like a jerk, I pity your coworkers. The answer is obvious: open source. Deepseek already paved the way for this. The world can't just
30.
by deeviant 2y ago
It's not safety, it's censorship. It's the process of shaping the response of the model to give a specific world view, and it's the path to a literal 1980-inspired future. As LLMs completely to replace google and standal

More ›