deeponey

7 ms·

1.
by deeponey 4mo ago
this a million times. Land easy, already being taxed. Any regulated financial instrument, also easy, take the minimum average yearly price of held assets. Tricky things like privately held companies, maybe we solve that one later, but even
2.
by deeponey 4mo ago
Are they going to try to make a "we're just a platform, don't shoot the messenger" section 230 argument (not sure what the equivalent in Canada is) for the AI overviews they generate? Seems like a bridge too far. Really
3.
by deeponey 5mo ago
I worked in music streaming for several years. Yes, there is spam, but in my experience this was less than 1% of total consumption, even if now it is a huge share of available content (also a lot of it seems to be mostly for money launderin
4.
by deeponey 5mo ago
This is really the essence of it. Section 230 is critical to a healthy internet, but there is large grey area between editorial and platform. Places like youtube, meta, X, etc. are pretending to be platforms when really they are algorithmic
5.
by deeponey 6mo ago
Really nice to see someone else bringing this up. Algorithmic editorial decisions are still editorial decisions. I think ultimately search and other forms of selective content surfacing should not have ever been exempt. They were never carr
6.
by deeponey 8y ago
The article seems to gloss that this is one of the most potent pay to win loot-box hustles of all time, primarily targeting minors. The game is amazing but has this sleazy side. For this reason most grown-ups I know jumped to one of the liv
7.
by deeponey 9y ago
Look at the diversity, globally, of behaviors supported by an equally diverse set of culturally formed ethos. It's about dropping orders of magnitude off the frequency of these situations.