deeplearner1

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by deeplearner1 4y ago

   Making things up out of thin air like “the creator used someone else’s compute” goes beyond negativity because someone thinks the project is in the grey. That is just straight up disinformation.
2. 2.▲
   by deeplearner1 4y ago

   Just curious. Do you feel the same way about DALL-E and Imagen?
3. 3.▲
   by deeplearner1 4y ago

   Do you still plan to publish your research in a paper?
4. 4.▲
   by deeplearner1 4y ago

   This entire thread is honestly so disturbing, this comment especially. Not only is it rife with misinformation (using copyrighted material for training is totally legal and the whole project is paid out of pocket), but is it really that big
5. 5.▲
   by deeplearner1 4y ago

   MIT doesn’t own the model, where did you get that idea from? If you read through the website, it says that the developer alone owns everything related to the project, and the only funding he received from MIT was a small amount from the beg
6. 6.▲
   by deeplearner1 4y ago

   “Make money”? The creator loses several thousands of dollars a month hosting the site, and it’s done for free. The Patreon donations are all voluntary and only offer a pittance to the developer. I highly suggest reading into the project fir
7. 7.▲
   by deeplearner1 4y ago

   If you want more information about 15.ai, I highly suggest reading their Wikipedia article! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15.ai The whole history behind the project is fascinating: 4chan had a huge role in its developm