deepakshenoy

8 ms·

1.
by deepakshenoy 4y ago
Cheers
2.
by deepakshenoy 4y ago
Banking payments are never useful to charge progressively. Always, one part of the banking system subsidises the other, so some players will pay for others, some borrowers will pay higher for others to get lower rates etc. Banking is not a
3.
by deepakshenoy 4y ago
Small merchants will ditch UPI Tiered just doesn't help if you want to encourage growth...it caps growth. Only very few large merchants will pay who already pay for debit or credit cards. Many of them pay for UPI anyhow as gateways cha
4.
by deepakshenoy 4y ago
A freemium service can already be built with a payment escrow for anti fraud protection, for willing merchants and customers. Fighting fraud is useful for banks to invest regardless of whether it's UPI or not, I'm not sure if you
5.
by deepakshenoy 4y ago
Thanks very much! I would love to hear your comments. I think UPI is incredible and well loved because it's free - putting a toll on something moving at this insane speed is just going to slow it down tremendously.
6.
by deepakshenoy 14y ago
IRCTC is still the biggest ecom site despite their UX and UI and all that; it simply solves a problem people want solved more than all the other stuff. India's ecom isn't about the fluff and the sub-millisecond response time; it's just abou
7.
by deepakshenoy 15y ago
Thanks - I wrote the original post ( http://capitalmind.in/2012/03/angel-investors-beware-funding... ) and have a few more that the recent Budget has introduced, at http://capitalmind.in/category/startups/startuptax/
8.
by deepakshenoy 15y ago
They can, but that hurts if you make any real revenue. If I invest $100 in a business, it spends the $100 but makes $60 as revenue, then the $40 is a loss. (And can be offset by profits in future years) With this new clause, the calculation
9.
by deepakshenoy 15y ago
kerosene.