deagle50

5 ms·

1.
by deagle50 3d ago
Because they've done a great job in shifting the narrative to doomerism, from the very beginning. And money.
2.
by deagle50 3d ago
I'll go a step further, they aren't just pretending, they are blackmailing the country. The sane response would be "we don't negotiate with terrorists, and you will face criminal and financial penalties for damages cause
3.
by deagle50 4d ago
he wants to write the regulation.
4.
by deagle50 4d ago
equity is a hell of a drug
5.
by deagle50 4d ago
Because it serves as a justification for regulation and government funding.
6.
by deagle50 15d ago
After IPO
7.
by deagle50 19d ago
do you mean GLM 5.3 flash?
8.
by deagle50 2mo ago
The road to hell was paved with adverbs.
9.
by deagle50 2mo ago
If he's so relieved that Bun/Anthropic are off Zig, then why trash Jarred? He should say thank you and move on. What this looks like to me is Jarred sinned by selling to Anthropic (as opposed to setting up a 501c3 or whatever Andr
10.
by deagle50 2mo ago
Of course they have. Fewer developers means fewer tokens sold. Until AI no longer needs human supervision, it's more profitable to tax as many employees as possible.
11.
by deagle50 3mo ago
correct
12.
by deagle50 3mo ago
you implied that not being given early access could bias you in the other direction. Which in my opinion would demonstrate that you are easily biased. Which would then call into question any opinion you share about the subject.
13.
by deagle50 3mo ago
the hypothetical you presented above
14.
by deagle50 3mo ago
If you're that easily biased then why trust your assessment?
15.
by deagle50 3mo ago
You kinda proved the point...
16.
by deagle50 4mo ago
Why would I roll custom allocation strategies in Go (and then be accountable for supporting them) that affect multiple teams and services when I can have an LLM port to Rust and get dozens of additional benefits?
17.
by deagle50 4mo ago
Or it could be insane to pay the cloud memory costs when you have tools that can write rust for you.
18.
by deagle50 4mo ago
Looks promising, is OpenAI subscription support planned?
19.
by deagle50 6mo ago
we're saying the same thing.
20.
by deagle50 7mo ago
step function
21.
by deagle50 7mo ago
Because they don't want you to improve.
22.
by deagle50 7mo ago
5.3 codex xhigh works for me
23.
by deagle50 7mo ago
codex cli. I switched, no regrets. Also, $20 for top model vs being limited to sonnet.
24.
by deagle50 7mo ago
> the compiler can now allocate the backing store for slices on the stack in more situations Any details on when this happens?
25.
by deagle50 10mo ago
For the same reason we don't commute on horses anymore. And safety.
26.
by deagle50 10mo ago
ZGC? It should be on par or better than Go.
27.
by deagle50 1y ago
I have the same feeling, and my best guess is that it's the intentional (and imo arbitrary) friction that has been sprinkled into the language. And camelCase.
28.
by deagle50 1y ago
parent said free, not open source. I want Mojo to succeed, but I'm also doubtful of the business model.
29.
by deagle50 1y ago
more like old school lib vs "new left"
30.
by deagle50 1y ago
> I mean, in 2025, not having crypto in stdlib when every man and his dog is using crypto ? Or http when every man and his dog are calling REST APIs ? I'm not and I'm glad the core team doesn't have to maintain an http ser

More ›