dbcpp

7 ms·

1.
by dbcpp 8mo ago
True, in that case it should just adopt the noexcept status of the object it holds.
2.
by dbcpp 8mo ago
I would argue performance-noexcept-move-constructor should always be on. Move constructors should almost always be noexcept since they typically just move pointers around and don't do allocations normally.
3.
by dbcpp 9mo ago
The scale and stakes of the investment now are much, much higher now than in dot com. Likewise, don't assume I'm more bearish than I am. But enormous investment requires more benefit than has been realized.
4.
by dbcpp 9mo ago
Quite a large bubble. The burden of proof for demonstrating the enormous economic value LLMs are providing really is yours. Sure, there are anecdotal benefits to using LLMs, but we haven't seen any evidence that in aggregate business
5.
by dbcpp 9mo ago
I'm not saying LLMs are useless. But the value they have provided so far does not justify covering the country in datacenters and the scale of investment overall (not even close!). The only justification for that would be "superi
6.
by dbcpp 9mo ago
Firstly, it's not really good enough to say "our employees use it" and therefore it's providing us significant value as a business. It's also not good enough to say "our programmers now write 10x the number of
7.
by dbcpp 9mo ago
The thing that drives me crazy is that it isn't even clear if AI is providing economic value yet (am I missing something there?). Right now trillions of dollars are being spent on a speculative technology that isn't benefitting a
8.
by dbcpp 9mo ago
Related to this, I've been wondering how much we should actually be depending on RLS for. There are known timing attacks against it [1]. [1] https://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~mad/publications/sigmod2023-rls.pd...