dazzeloid

6 ms·

1.
by dazzeloid 1y ago
mid-level output, clearly had more capability than his output suggested from his ideas and some particularly strong contributions
2.
by dazzeloid 1y ago
trust. he was not forthcoming when confronted with the "this other company says you are full-time and just went to their offsite - is that true?"
3.
by dazzeloid 1y ago
funny thing was he had other places on his linkedin under "active employment" but we never really dug into it (until we learned he was full-time there) because he just seemed like the kind of person who wouldn't keep his Link
4.
by dazzeloid 1y ago
He was a solid middle of the pack contributor on net, but it was clear he was way stronger than his net output just from interactions with him (he had great products ideas, clear technical understanding of many areas, etc).
5.
by dazzeloid 1y ago
he's a really talented engineer, crushed our interviews. the funny thing was that he actually had multiple companies on his linkedin at the same time, including ours. we just thought they must have been internships or something and he
6.
by dazzeloid 2y ago
Cosign, Spenser and I are aligned on this :)
7.
by dazzeloid 2y ago
<3 thank you!
8.
by dazzeloid 2y ago
I both think this comment is spot on (acquisition theater / cope-core is very real) and what I said was true :) Obviously, the better financial outcome is to grow huge independently and go public, etc, but there are a lot of good outco
9.
by dazzeloid 2y ago
Command AI co-founder here. What I'll add to Spenser's nice comment is that there was this strange tension when we were deciding to do this between: (1) Feeling like the only right outcome for a growing startup with runway is to
10.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
I'm going to be following very closely how Arc approaches monetization. Don't think they've talked much about this yet. Right now they are towing the line between art project and business extremely well so far, but I wonder h
11.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
Love the concept of prompt velocity. Although it doesn't capture the initial quality of the prompt or whether the changes are effective.
12.
Show HN: Hyper-personalized, built-for-one user walkthroughs(commandbar.com)
7 points by dazzeloid 3y ago|1 comments
13.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
A frustration I have with langchain is the number of primitives and terms -- insane how long this blog post needs to be to explain everything.
14.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
It is completely mind blowing to me that the first version of Gmail was built in a day. YC mindset before YC.
15.
Creating Gmail(commandbar.com)
6 points by dazzeloid 3y ago|3 comments
16.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
Here for the "I could build this in a weekend" comment so I can bookmark for the IPO :)
17.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
I'm not super familiar with chatbase (which looks awesome in its own right). Some things that I haven't seen before: -Semantic search added -Ability to open source docs in the widget -Recommendation sets -Personalized suggested qu
18.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
Right now it's hitting OpenAI, but we want to try out other LLMs in the future.
19.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
it's a main quest now!!
20.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
Wrote about a few things here: https://www.commandbar.com/blog/why-we-built-helphub There are so many low-hanging fruit: -Edit the system prompt -Shape common answers -Give bot access to actions so it can act like Chat
21.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
Not currently but would be pretty easy with our API. Just a different UI.
22.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
Lotties :sweat
23.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
I guess my concern is being a system of adjusted record on top of a system of record. Wouldn't it be a cluster if changes are being made to docs in CommandBar but not [Zendesk]? That said maybe there's room to store bot-specific s
24.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
Wahhh. Strava example?
25.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
For CMS's we built custom integrations (not just a generic crawler) that strips out obviously sensitive info like internal notes to support people. Nothing revolutionary to report on the prompt injection stuff. Most people using HH are
26.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
If we're doing our job right then HH should only be answering based on its source content (and not background knowledge). So bad answers coming from incorrect source content would need to be corrected in the source content. Citations s
27.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
Oops looking into it. Do you remember which bot you used and what question you asked?
28.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
Not yet but this has come up a lot so thinking about it. We probably don't want to build our own human ticketing system so the clearest path would be to have an entrypoint to kick the user over to something like intercom and maybe prov
29.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
HN has slowed it down a bit but speed is definitely not where I want it to be. A lot of that comes from the openai side atm. Just turned on caching for the suggested questions so at least those are extremely fast.
30.
by dazzeloid 3y ago
That pricing is for our whole product, which includes more than just Helphub. For HH only we have a free tier with 2k messages / mo and a $50 tier for 10k messages a month. https://www.commandbar.com/pricing-helphub

More ›