davidgordon

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by davidgordon 9y ago

   Are you sure? Specifically it isn't necessarily about advertisers it regards surveillance. Advertising revenue can be completely offset by Governmental tracking. As I said in the other post we can't prove the positive but it certa
2. 2.▲
   by davidgordon 9y ago

   Another point is even if Cambridge Analytica didn't exist, Facebook itself would and are doing the same things themselves, although not over a 50M population radius but over a billion. With a budget to match.
3. 3.▲
   by davidgordon 9y ago

   Absolutely and hits the nail on the head. We can't be seen to pick on Facebook or CA here since there is a bigger picture. It's not about picking on anyone, it's about a line being crossed and bringing it back home. Thank you
4. 4.▲
   by davidgordon 9y ago

   Lack of evidence is conspicuous in of itself, although that right now is tin foil hat territory. I'll tell you in a few years. On the other hand I'd refer you to Bletchley Park. Turing et al knew the decrypted Enigma messages but
5. 5.▲
   by davidgordon 9y ago

   Let us please remember that these incidents are not specific to Facebook, rather they are systemic to the big five. A couple of years or more I was posting on Facebook regarding Cambridge Analytica's practices and was considered a tin