dartos

8 ms·

1.
by dartos 7d ago
> But killing all humans? Not likely. I hope you're right. But the US dept of war is using grok. [1] I don't really trust them to use it responsibly. That is to say, I expect those using it to just go along with whatever it say
2.
by dartos 7d ago
His initial tweet was retweeted by someone who currently works at anthropic who agrees. It really all smells like hype marketing to me. The whole media is in a frenzy about a tweet from an obvious plant account…
3.
by dartos 8d ago
This same username with the same profile pic has an instagram account from Japan with next to no posts that just became active the other day posting AGI doomer rants like this… If anyone takes this seriously… maybe it’s better AI does your
4.
by dartos 8d ago
This guy’s account was made in January and has 7 tweets? Is this even a real person, or just pre-IPO marketing?
5.
by dartos 1y ago
> Really strange how some people took a term that supposed to be a "lol watch this" and started using it for work... don't forget about the insane amount of marketing around AI code companies and how they put "vibe co
6.
by dartos 1y ago
> The world is not ready for systems that indulge people in their bullshit. we never were. that's why the world is how it is rn.
7.
by dartos 1y ago
I think that’d make for interesting experiments and fringe sites, I don’t really see like your average e-commerce site ever doing anything like that. You’d want the A and B to be intentional, not automatically generated. Every VP thinks the
8.
by dartos 1y ago
Probably because both anthropic and openai were on the whole AGI train where they were trying to heavily personify their products. Google never seemed to personify theirs, IIRC. They always presented their AI tools in a utilitarian way.
9.
by dartos 1y ago
If you use too many words, you’re not good at writing words.
10.
by dartos 1y ago
There’s no “and.” I’m just stating a fact. No discussion of wrong or right or whatever. Just pointing out how there is no more rule of law in the US. Idk when exactly it disappeared, but it’s definitely not present anymore
11.
by dartos 1y ago
I asked if you would be willing to share your work and workflow. You could say nothing. You could just say “I can’t, it’s for my job, but my workflow looks like this…” or something. You could say you’re not comfortable sharing. You could sh
12.
by dartos 1y ago
really? because of the current situation in the US...
13.
by dartos 1y ago
Sorry, but have you paid attention to the legal system in the states? Large corporations and their execs live by different laws than the rest of us. That’s how it is. Anything is else is, unfortunately, a fiction in this country.
14.
by dartos 1y ago
A bit cynical, no?
15.
by dartos 1y ago
I long for the day when someone can give advice based on their own personal experience without someone else being like “well that won’t work for literally everyone” Yeah obviously. It’s a personal anecdote.
16.
by dartos 1y ago
So you’re not willing to share anything? Just anecdotes and platitudes? Not even some reasoning? Also note that I chose my words carefully when I said “Nothing I’ve seen indicates that is possible right now.” I used “right now” to not rule
17.
by dartos 1y ago
I just can’t believe you. Nothing I’ve seen indicates that is possible right now. Would you be willing to share your code and your workflow? > >You literally can't put enough context into a prompt to have it write the exact code
18.
by dartos 1y ago
I’ll need to read up on genetic algorithms, I think. That sounds really cool, but coming from training other statistical models, im having a hard time imagining what the training loop looks like.
19.
by dartos 1y ago
> deploy thousands of lines of code to production without you needing to change a single thing. I’m not saying this is impossible. I’m saying it leads to poor quality products. Deploying thousands of lines of code isn’t necessarily a goo
20.
by dartos 1y ago
you're talking about specifically using genetic programming to create new programs as opposed to gradient decend in LLMs to minimize a loss function, right? How would you construct a genetic algorithm to produce natural language like L
21.
by dartos 1y ago
Either you're not relying as much on the AI as you think you are, or you're not really sure what "production quality" means. It seems like you should know, so I'm going to bet that you're not entirely letting t
22.
by dartos 1y ago
I’d say this is more a tool for prototypes. You could secure angel funding off a simple prototype. You could also make something funny and share it with friends, if it doesn’t need to be monetized. I wouldn’t use tools like this for long li
23.
by dartos 1y ago
It’s only the bottleneck for orgs that don’t know how to keep focus and bloated orgs with too many teams/managers/engineers. And scrappy startups made by businesses school dropouts (and grads)
24.
by dartos 1y ago
> vibe coding was not made up Here’s the tweet that literally made up vibe coding: https://x.com/karpathy/status/1886192184808149383?lang=en One might say blindly following hype is silly and cope too. I’ve seen
25.
by dartos 1y ago
I think it’s like any other tool. Some people get better mileage out of it than others. There are even very skilled and accomplished engineers that don’t even use language servers. Not programming, but even some legendary Disney animators s
26.
by dartos 1y ago
The image that they’re forward thinking by embracing a trend that VCs love. The image isn’t for potential employees, it’s for VCs and hype.
27.
by dartos 1y ago
What about it gives off the AI smell to you?
28.
by dartos 1y ago
I meant in the code……… obviously…
29.
by dartos 1y ago
Yeah I don’t see anything that even suggests it throttles the PC. Looks like it’s just a display.
30.
by dartos 1y ago
LLMs as a natural language interface is fine. What I’m saying is that if there was a standard protocol for making travel plans over the internet, we wouldn’t need an AI agent to book a trip. We could just create great user experiences that

More ›