darkarmani

5 ms·

1.
by darkarmani 2mo ago
Do you know something about this that no one else knows? How many innocent people do you think are mentioned in those millions of documents?
2.
by darkarmani 4mo ago
Did he predict odds? How are you so sure his odds were wrong?
3.
by darkarmani 5mo ago
> or simply look at outcomes. Good work being done at the FDA, just fact. A good outcome doesn't mean there was good work being done. You are conflating the two. You can make bad decisions and still have a good outcome. I'm h
4.
by darkarmani 6mo ago
> co2 will cook the planet It doesn't have to cook the planet to cause massive suffering. Do you think there hasn't been global warming? What amount of global warming would change your mind?
5.
by darkarmani 6mo ago
Are you sure it is just clay? Sandy clay packs even tighter than just clay: https://www.uaex.uada.edu/farm-ranch/crops-commercial-hortic... "If you mix sand into clay, the clay particles will fill in all the open
6.
by darkarmani 8mo ago
> they should have oversight Congress provides oversight and accountability of the Fed. The GAO does audits as well. Frank-Dodd provides more windows into the Fed. Why did you think the Fed doesn't have oversight? > Not ever
7.
by darkarmani 11mo ago
One can not be happy with that and understand that Trump would have found ways to lock up his son for 20 years. No one thinks this dude was going to be punished for political reasons.
8.
by darkarmani 2y ago
Is the schema considered private information or just information not required to be released via FOIA? ie: Can't some nice employee leak this information or is it legally protected? Once the information is released, can anyone can mak
9.
by darkarmani 2y ago
The gov't releasing the hardware and software licencing used in CANVAS already gives that away.
10.
by darkarmani 2y ago
> They could have taken legal actions against Sectigo's CCO directly You are only suggesting they could have handled it worse. Why would they take legal action against the CCO for statements on a bug report other than to squash tra
11.
by darkarmani 2y ago
> If DigiCert is about to do something crazy like take down all your websites, courts are generally willing to put a temporary stop to it without understanding all the details. "Preserve the status quo" and "prevent irrepa
12.
by darkarmani 2y ago
That sounds like a legal height then.
13.
by darkarmani 2y ago
They don't need approval for under 400 FT AGL in class G airspace. The idiots reporting on it have NO idea how high these drones are. And the military has a bunch of carved airspace in various places. I think last time i looked (4 we
14.
by darkarmani 2y ago
> despite the drones being bigger and higher tech than retail drones. How does anyone know how big these are? I've heard reports like this: 1. They looks larger than normal drones. 2. The look like they are operating at a height gr
15.
by darkarmani 2y ago
> Yes the court's judgment is so high, 1B USD, that he cannot make money without it being garnished. How does he get back to work? I personally do not think anyone should lose their livelihood over speech He was harassing parents of
16.
by darkarmani 2y ago
How could Hillary lose if she had an 80% chance? That seems impossible (if i'm bad at math)!
17.
by darkarmani 3y ago
Instead of a pihole, you'd run a https proxy that doesn't trust the certs i guess.
18.
by darkarmani 3y ago
Oh! That is a good way to conflate the issue. "It's for signing and verification." That definitely has almost nothing to do with TLS and browsers. Why does my browser need to verify national ID cards? (no need to answer t
19.
by darkarmani 3y ago
It's not a "security check" it's just informing the user about their certs...
20.
by darkarmani 3y ago
The second they do that the entire internet is going to download it to see what the fuss is about. While they could legally do that, it's going to blow up in their face if they did it. I remember the old crypto export wars in the US a
21.
by darkarmani 3y ago
> don't leave sensitive data out there Where "out there" is Okta. You are basically saying: Don't leave sensitive data with Okta.
22.
by darkarmani 3y ago
"yet another Okta compromise" sounds passive to you?
23.
by darkarmani 3y ago
802.1x. At least that was what could be used 12 years ago. I don't know about state of the art now.
24.
by darkarmani 3y ago
> Make it a legal requirement for parents to set up this option for their children on every device they use. Why? Let the parents decide -- they now have the controls they need. > Make it illegal to send invalid "safe content&qu
25.
by darkarmani 3y ago
Hashicorp wouldn't have a successful product if they hadn't open sourced their code. Now that they are entrenched, they want to change rules (and whine about it) because it makes them more money.
26.
by darkarmani 3y ago
Isn't that totally different? I thought brick and mortar stores actually buy inventory (or commit to buy orders in this age of just-in-time) where Amazon is just the middleman connecting buyers and sellers and charging fees on both en
27.
by darkarmani 3y ago
So every URL is a trespass unless you have explicit permission? If you say the protocol determines authorization, then the Fizz protocol granted them authorization. I don't have a clear answer here because it is messy.
28.
by darkarmani 3y ago
It's not hell because they carefully curate the set of libraries rather than having end-users attempt to have every combination of packages (and then blame microsoft for the dependency hell / lack of support for their exact config
29.
by darkarmani 3y ago
I'm not sure why that is a problem. He didn't have to know anything about Anaconda. And for stability, you can still install 10-year old python 2.7 packages from Anaconda. 9 months is no problem at all for stability.
30.
by darkarmani 3y ago
It's the dependency hell problem as packages are added to the sandbox environment. If they were just shipping python (standard library), it would be fine, but all of the useful libraries have large numbers of dependencies.

More ›