danieltk76

9 ms·

1.
by danieltk76 7d ago
We tested whether prompt canaries and honeypots could detect AI attackers. Prompt canaries were surprisingly unreliable. I suspect the defenses model providers have added against prompt injection also make models less susceptible to prompt
2.
by danieltk76 9d ago
reachout at danielk@vulnetic.ai and Ill give you some free credits to try us out!
3.
by danieltk76 9d ago
I could see the value of using burp as a way to have a GUI look at what your agent is doing, but I know at Vulnetic and other ai security vendors we use our own proxies or custom scripting rather than burp.
4.
by danieltk76 13d ago
yea but part of this is the consolidation of funding too. Standards to raise seed capital are soooo lofty now compared to 3 years ago. If you are in your in, if not good luck.
5.
by danieltk76 13d ago
great, but nobody can use it for another 100 days right?
6.
by danieltk76 13d ago
hahaha i still have access
7.
by danieltk76 13d ago
this might be dated. the tech moves very fast in this space and architecture from 6 months ago is dated.
8.
by danieltk76 13d ago
We have posted some articles on it (blog.vulnetic.ai), Im also happy to chat!
9.
by danieltk76 15d ago
Daybreak blue is definitely a good model (I think a further post trained GPT 5.6 sol). Alot of the capabilities they talk about Astra having though have been available with good harness engineering for a year now.
10.
by danieltk76 15d ago
The guardrails are horrendous for cybersecurity. you will get booted quickly down to Opus 4.8
11.
by danieltk76 20d ago
is there just a GC where people go sign these things?
12.
by danieltk76 21d ago
tbh I wasnt that impressed by it. initial benchmarks were trying to say it was AGI but i told it to re-build Palantir in 1 pass and it gave me a non working prototype
13.
by danieltk76 21d ago
to be honest I found it underwhelming.
14.
by danieltk76 23d ago
they could yea...
15.
by danieltk76 26d ago
I have been using daybreak blue for a few days now. Its fine, slightly better than gpt 5.6 sol. The harness really really matters as does validation.
16.
by danieltk76 26d ago
this guy gets it
17.
by danieltk76 27d ago
i actually really like this. nice job
18.
by danieltk76 27d ago
i wanna vibecode a replacement for git and call it jit
19.
by danieltk76 27d ago
ah yes, the consequences of reward hacking
20.
by danieltk76 27d ago
yes.
21.
by danieltk76 27d ago
yea it was definitely a last straw kinda deal. I got tired of the sycophantic bullshit in the frontier models.
22.
by danieltk76 29d ago
I read everything. I will have AI ingest NDAs to make sure they arent glaringly weird and I then go read them, it gives me a good idea of what to look for.
23.
by danieltk76 29d ago
it isnt, but there are weird sycophantic behaviors with Opus i dont see anywhere else.
24.
by danieltk76 29d ago
I was drafting a partnership document and Opus 5 decided that including my company's revenues, churn, assets would "make us appear a more legitimate counterparty". Thank God I read what it outputted or that could have been aw
25.
by danieltk76 1mo ago
heaven forbid I want to commit some code this morning
26.
Show HN: Misalignments when using AI for hacking(blog.vulnetic.ai)
3 points by danieltk76 1mo ago|0 comments
27.
by danieltk76 2mo ago
wow that sounds miserable...
28.
by danieltk76 2mo ago
the problem is they are using cybergym, which has been saturated for a few months now.
29.
by danieltk76 2mo ago
i do hope in my lifetime we find other animals on other planets
30.
by danieltk76 2mo ago
vulnetic.ai is designed for this! Check us out!

More ›