danieljomphe

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by danieljomphe 15y ago

   Forget my last paragraph. Anyways, richhickey answered. :)
2. 2.▲
   by danieljomphe 15y ago

   From what I remember, compare-and-swap semantics are in place for that kind of case. If that was not the case, you could still model such an order-dependent update as the fact that the counter has seen one more hit. Let the final query redu
3. 3.▲
   by danieljomphe 15y ago

   Notwithstanding what it's initially designed for, I think it may be quite good at supporting an "offline mode" as long as: 1. the app developer can confidently predict which queries the app will need through its lifespan, and 2. the app dev
4. 4.▲
   by danieljomphe 15y ago

   Right. So the only way to make Peers resilient to network partitions is to install a middleman between them and the DB/Transactor. One whose responsibility is to ensure this Peer's app always has durable access to everything it's ever going
5. 5.▲
   by danieljomphe 15y ago

   Thus Datomic would be very great for centrally-operated systems, but not so much with highly distributed systems where many peers are often partitioned out because, for example, they have no Internet connectivity for a few days, and they st