dan_gee

9 ms·

1.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
> I think that LLMs are going to wreck the peer review system for all but hard-experimental papers I think I may be shadowbanned, but at what point do we start viewing LLMs as a national security threat?
2.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
Unfortunately I think that we need to be much more judgmental than is tolerated on this forum if we want to get people to stop writing with AI assistance. People are not going to stop spamming you with slop text unless the narrative is &quo
3.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
I didn't see that other comment and I appreciated the presence of the comment in question.
4.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
My point is that the differences between these models are so minor that obsessively benchmarking them comes across as navel-gazing.
5.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
I thought the comment was a positive contribution.
6.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
From my perspective, the primary end-user selling point of LLM assistants is not having to read or write anymore. I think a lot of the "AI Addicts" are masking illiteracy, which is why they cling so passionately to the technology.
7.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
Moreso what I'm trying to say is that AGI is a return to the eighteenth/ninetheenth century fantasy of slavery as a business model. AGI means cruelty-free robot slaves.
8.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
Could you leave a comment expressing your perspective?
9.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
> As I mentioned in this thread the other day, it's not worth debating AI skeptics anymore in 2026 This is pretty rude!
10.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
IMO AGI is a bold-faced lie, backed by the age-old American fantasy of free labor. The whole concept seems quite ugly to me.
11.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
If you don't mind sharing, what types of jobs are you working on now? I haven't personally seen a speed boost from LLMs, but my experience with them suggests that they could be effective in some domains and inadequate in others. E
12.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
Thank you for your comment. The narrative that LLMs are essential to the future of the trade often feels like an assault on my professional expertise. Whatever your experience is, mine is that LLMs don't work well for software developm
13.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
> Think of all the shops that will soon be composed of people that simply can't even get out of bed, if their LLM is not available. I'm biased because I don't use AI, but I don't understand why you wouldn't fire
14.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
Just my personal experience. I'm not really interested in giving up more personal details in this forum, apologies for that.
15.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
As a C++ developer, AI does not work well for software development in my experience. Maybe LLM developer tools work better if you write React or HTML/CSS, but they have been inadequate for my use case since their arrival.
16.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
Can you elaborate on what happened that made you look dumb?
17.
by dan_gee 2mo ago
A resolute anti-AI perspective is a breath of fresh air compared to the middle-of-the-road "AI made me 10x more productive BUT"-style comments. My professional opinion is that LLM technology doesn't work very well for softwar