dambi0

6 ms·

1.
by dambi0 1y ago
The article you shared mentions a report and a committee that analyzed the report. You don’t happen to have any further details on those do you? I couldn’t immediately find the details in the article
2.
by dambi0 1y ago
A new account would tend not to have any history. It seems uncharitable to immediately assume bad faith. What is it about the content of the comment you disagree with? I think it provides a further example to the parent post that regardless
3.
by dambi0 1y ago
That isn't true at all. Some of the argument relies on the experience of an Austrian education, but we are also encouraged to refer to other provided sources if we choose to seek other opinions.
4.
by dambi0 1y ago
Which is just as true of the argument > Probably because you've seen it repeated so much in your hyper-propaganda bubble of reddit that you've started to believe it
5.
by dambi0 1y ago
It could serve as a convenient distraction from rising prices or, more conveniently, risks introduced as a move to less staffing because of self-checkout. It’s a bit easier to explain away the inconvenience of locked individual items as a r
6.
by dambi0 1y ago
Or alternatively the word play wasn’t very good.
7.
by dambi0 1y ago
Ruling out or refining an approach on the grounds it’s unlikely to lead to a suitable outcome (fixing and removing slop) is not the same as saying this code or approach represents a good enough outcome given what we currently know about the
8.
by dambi0 1y ago
Well seeing as you alluded to having references amongst many I figured you might have the statistics to hand. Additionally why did you focus on new registrations rather than all registered vehicles?
9.
by dambi0 1y ago
What if you include statistics on vans rather than just passenger cars?
10.
by dambi0 1y ago
How much plot could one or two paragraphs from a wider body of work contain? We do learn more than it’s just muddy. For example the Lord Chancellor is somewhat introduced. We know the time of year. We know it’s been muddy for a while. We k
11.
by dambi0 1y ago
The fact we have labels for communication problems caused by failure to understand non-verbal cues doesn’t tell us that non-verbal cues are necessary for understanding
12.
by dambi0 1y ago
At risk of pedantry and not to diminish the overall point. I think the graphite deposit was in Borrowdale which is in NW England. There’s actually a pencil museum in Keswick, a nearby town.
13.
by dambi0 1y ago
Do you think humans are less likely to be wrong or just less likely to apologize when they are?
14.
by dambi0 1y ago
A UK post code is much more specific than a five digit zip code which might be one reason why.
15.
by dambi0 1y ago
With suitable safeguards or limits on what it can spend why not? On the one hand it might not fear repercussions as a human would, on the other hand it’s far less likely to embezzle funds to support its overly lavish lifestyle or gambling a
16.
by dambi0 1y ago
Have you ever found your opinions of things, including people’s relative worth changing over time? Perhaps as you had time to understand the context, or as time revealed the benefit of an action that wasn’t so clear initially?
17.
by dambi0 2y ago
Alternatively perhaps the cost of implementing / performing the overhead of signing and verification isn’t worth the cost given the relatively few people who are likely to do this
18.
by dambi0 2y ago
Broken seems a bit harsh. It might not be idiomatic, it might fall foul of some grammatical standard. But you know what it means.
19.
by dambi0 2y ago
What meaning do you infer from what it says?
20.
by dambi0 2y ago
Your daughter may have implemented it procedurally but your description of the task was functional.
21.
by dambi0 2y ago
Are you saying that Rust is always the right choice for any problem? If not what’s the link between the merits of any technology and the guarantee that the selection was not resume driven?
22.
by dambi0 2y ago
You could just as well argue that changing direction or admitting you got things wrong requires more spine than blindly sticking to the same direction even in light of new information. Whether that applies to Starmer is a matter of opinion
23.
by dambi0 2y ago
Logseq might be worth a look. It supports org-mode files to a degree. There’s a lot of org functionality. You can just about edit the files in emacs directly.
24.
by dambi0 2y ago
Given this is about new technologies or more accurately the potential misuse of new technology, I think we can infer we are talking newer models of cars rather than cars already on the road.
25.
by dambi0 2y ago
By half-life do you mean the point at which you decide to renew the certificate prior to its actual expiry? Couldn’t you as a matter of policy decide to do this at, say 45 days, even with a cert that lasts for a year? If so, then the change
26.
by dambi0 2y ago
There is a difference between the question “LLMs don’t understand Bells Theorem what does this tell us about physics” and “LLMs don’t understand Bells Theorem what does this tell us about LLMs”.
27.
by dambi0 2y ago
Claiming thst the phrase “extremely important” is indicative of AI authorship is preposterous.
28.
by dambi0 2y ago
Couldn’t you just as well say that the people who were above average at English were good at science/math?
29.
by dambi0 2y ago
Regardless of the people involved, being asked to consider someone’s opinion on a matter is a world apart from claiming they are an authority on the topic.
30.
by dambi0 2y ago
I assume you meant this is a rebuttal of the parent comment. It's interesting that it could just as well be seen as confirmation.

More ›