dakimov

7 ms·

1.
by dakimov 13y ago
What a talentless useless bullshit.
2.
by dakimov 13y ago
This is... awesome! What is more important, it is actually usable.
3.
by dakimov 13y ago
My condolences to you. Now your product has become a target of mockery. Also I love cats and feel sorry that the name of those lovely animals is used in a discredited entity. The problem is that your product did not have just a security vul
4.
by dakimov 13y ago
I can measure how rational you really are. The result is around zero. Seriously, come on, people are not rationally thinking creatures at all, nobody is. There is nothing to even measure. If everybody became rational, the world would collap
5.
by dakimov 13y ago
Basically those are examples of bare pointer manipulations (as references are essentially syntactically sugared bare pointers). Although it can be mitigated with specially written collections (incompatible with the standard collections) and
6.
by dakimov 13y ago
This is hilarious.
7.
by dakimov 13y ago
What are you talking about? The safety you mentioned comes from only two things: type safety and runtime array boundary checks. There is no problem in implementing runtime boundary check in C++. What else in C++ is less safe than in Java? I
8.
by dakimov 13y ago
Don't you think that first off you need to be an expert in all those languages, in web-technologies, have vast experience and up to date knowledge in all of that, to make such claims? I'm pretty sure you just have wrong impression
9.
by dakimov 13y ago
If I have my opinion, I probably have reasons for it. Taking everything from an emotional perspective is dumb.
10.
by dakimov 13y ago
Hikikomori, momorikiki. Those are usual mental health problems such as depression (probably, around 98%), psychopathy, or mental retardation. Those guys just need to see the doctor, a psychotherapist. Giving them tags and doing nothing abou
11.
by dakimov 13y ago
It is totally fine! Compare this to Android: http://bluebox.com/corporate-blog/bluebox-uncovers-android-m... Security, privacy, copyright — these are three problems the humankind is as dumb as a monkey with.
12.
by dakimov 13y ago
Platforms.
13.
by dakimov 13y ago
Orly? If your language is handicapped maybe. In normal languages you have no problems with threads, and the assertion that multiprocessing is the way makes no sense.
14.
by dakimov 13y ago
Another repetition of that commonplace. If you're stupid and untalented, it won't help you, if you're smart and talented you do not need those generalisms and their points are not important to you.
15.
by dakimov 13y ago
Why is this important?
16.
by dakimov 13y ago
The schoolboys from this site are laughing at their faces for such a miserable exit.
17.
by dakimov 13y ago
Cool.
18.
by dakimov 13y ago
You could do something useful instead.
19.
by dakimov 13y ago
The open source continues to kill the industry burying the progress under loads of free shit like that.
20.
by dakimov 13y ago
Sorry, I tried to look smart talking about things I did not know enough about. I sometimes do this because I am very frustrated, as I am your age and have not done anything significant with my life. It gives me a huge amount of butthurt loo
21.
by dakimov 13y ago
It looks to me that your references contradict you. How many companies have you sold? I do not know whether the due diligence is supposed to be done after an offer, but when you are negligible to a company that will possibly acquire you, th
22.
by dakimov 13y ago
Before they make an offer, they will perform a complete assessment of your company, it is called "due diligence". They do not easily throw money at you.
23.
by dakimov 13y ago
I would use a paid search service with a quality search, no ads, no tracking, and no selling my data to third-parties.
24.
by dakimov 13y ago
I do not have such experience, so you can skip my comment, if you wish. But there is the Dropbox, Github, Bitbucket and many others' model: tolerate the mass of completely free users, have no ads, balancing it with paid accounts with e
25.
by dakimov 13y ago
Actually, in a naive implementation it is very computationally intensive, especially with large convolution cores (like on iOS 7 where it appears huge) and high resolutions. Even optimized implementations on GPU are still computationally in
26.
by dakimov 13y ago
You may be surprised, but iPhone 5, or even more, Galaxy S4 are capable of much more than that crap. Like the full 3D with bump mapping, environment mapping and dynamic lighting. The main problem is iOS 7 does not invoke a desire to copy it
27.
by dakimov 13y ago
Global automatically declared variables is a well-known bad feature of some non-modern languages that gives nothing but an opportunity to make hardly detectable mistakes because of misprints. Arbitrary nonsensical type casts must be prohibi
28.
by dakimov 13y ago
On one hand, the whole web stack is completely broken and insane. On the other hand, if you use the right development methodologies such as unit testing, MVC, MVP, MVVM, and/or frameworks that translate statically typed or functional c
29.
by dakimov 13y ago
Great sheet. -- Variables are global by default. thisIsGlobal = 5 -- Camel case is common. -- Undefined variables return nil. -- This is not an error: foo = anUnknownVariable -- Now foo = nil. -- Only nil and false are falsy; 0 a
30.
by dakimov 13y ago
C'mon, Atlassian is not evil, they just want to avoid being sued. I think that end-user agreements must be prohibited altogether, because it is a mean of discrimination. Either you provide a public service and then your relationships w

More ›