dablweb

7 ms·

1.
by dablweb 2y ago
Remote.com also compete in this space, and they have a pretty good UI and customer service. Not cheap, but worth it for sure considering how much time they save you.
2.
by dablweb 3y ago
This is an incredibly bad and short-sighted take. This is not at all the same situation, and this sort of hubris is what causes public health disasters such as the Vioxx, Thalidomide or Dengvaxia scandals. This is artificially created genet
3.
by dablweb 3y ago
From what I understand, yes. Natural mRNA is too unstable to reliably transport into the cell via injection. Part of the reason mRNA gene treatments spent so long in development without a single approved product. The two technologies that f
4.
by dablweb 3y ago
Ah that's where the small print is important. This isn't "mRNA" this is modified-mRNA (where the name Moderna comes from). Unfortunately they are allowed to abbreviate it as mRNA, which IMO is extremely problematic. Modi
5.
by dablweb 3y ago
Ironic that nature publishes this despite being guilty of constantly promoting it.
6.
by dablweb 3y ago
That's not really the case here. Gain of function research can not be justified using this argument. There are so many potential mutations that putting specific evolutionary pressure on a virus in order to "prevent" only thos
7.
by dablweb 4y ago
Maybe a fractional reserve banking system that allows banks to create money out of nothing through mortgage contracts and funnel it straight into the housing market, causing inflation and soaring debt, was a colossal mistake. There, I fixed
8.
by dablweb 4y ago
Banks create money out of nothing when they give you a mortgage. It's called fractional reserve banking. They're not "lending" you anything... your house becomes the collateral they use to create money from the mortgage
9.
by dablweb 4y ago
It's interesting that we're not allowed to debate the existence of the crisis in the first place... it's just accepted as an a priori fact and anyone who provides even the slightest push-back is ridiculed and silenced.
10.
by dablweb 4y ago
> As long as vaccine side effects cause less deaths and less harm than the virus, vaccination is still the way to go. No. This is the wrong criteria to judge by. Right now it takes ~30,000 injections to prevent one hospitalization from C
11.
by dablweb 4y ago
"mistakes"
12.
by dablweb 5y ago
> only be given if the government's gotten a name / SSN / real-life identity to associate with that address A.K.A. biometric vaccine passport
13.
by dablweb 5y ago
Fasting. You can train yourself to go from 8 hours (sleep) to 16 hours pretty easily. Once you get to a point where you can one-meal-a-day comfortably, then extending this to a 48hr fast once a week becomes relatively easy too.
14.
by dablweb 5y ago
Sites like Reddit, Facebook and Twitter can very easily become a political tool for manufacturing artificial consensus. A large portion of the population do not go to specific news sites directly but instead rely on a link aggregator, Reddi
15.
by dablweb 5y ago
You might be able to go to reveddit.com and run your profile through it? It shows banned and shadow-banned content. Subreddits are banning people for simply participating in blacklisted topics / subreddits. Reddit's censorship has
16.
by dablweb 5y ago
It's not just privacy we need to be worried about. It's the manipulation of public consciousness which I believe is the most alarming.
17.
by dablweb 5y ago
Just head over to reveddit.com and look at a few controversial subreddits without the shadow-banning. It's truly terrifying to see the true scale of censorship and ghost-banning in big tech right now.
18.
by dablweb 5y ago
You'd think so, but in doing so you've just imagined the world's most terrifying propaganda tool.
19.
by dablweb 5y ago
We were promised this wouldn't happen by our governments last year right? It feels like the public are building their own prisons. Why are private companies stuck policing these absurd policies?
20.
by dablweb 5y ago
It's astonishing that the majority of people can look at this situation and not recoil. The whole "mix and match" narrative is just so misguided. I do wonder if it's being pushed as a way to dilute possible lawsuits.
21.
by dablweb 5y ago
Wouldn't mixing significantly reduce your chance at legal recourse should you have a severe reaction?
22.
by dablweb 5y ago
Can't tell if sarcastic...
23.
by dablweb 5y ago
Do you have any source for the claim that myocarditis is less severe after the vaccine than after infection? I was under the impression it was the opposite due to most infections remaining in the airways.
24.
by dablweb 5y ago
Uh, we don't really have a control group anymore. This whole rollout has been rife with callous disregard for the usual protocols. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/9691430...
25.
by dablweb 5y ago
I think they make a decent point, and contributed to this conversation. Calm down.
26.
by dablweb 5y ago
Uh, didn't we know this like... more than a year ago?
27.
by dablweb 5y ago
Not not mention the smear campaign that was instantly retracted when put under the slightest scrutiny. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...
28.
by dablweb 5y ago
You're not wrong. We NEED large scale trials for this ASAP. I don't understand your knee-jerk negativity here though. There are plenty of non-double-blind studies that show significant potency of these treatments. Not only this, i
29.
by dablweb 5y ago
Your argument is sound. It is however, built on one glaring assumption: the people in charge of the publicly funded healthcare systems are primarily incentivized to find cheap and safe treatments for the illness. I think when you look at th
30.
by dablweb 5y ago
Just be careful with your state file when upgrading!

More ›