dabadoo

10 ms·

1.
by dabadoo 10y ago
Its not really true. Half the time it goes down half the time it goes up.
2.
by dabadoo 10y ago
That's true only for a selection of music, even if its a large part. I personally don't care. I just want to listen to something that sounds good.
3.
by dabadoo 10y ago
Where do you pull product reviews from? How much views/income do you get?
4.
by dabadoo 10y ago
Goodbye Snapchat IPO
5.
by dabadoo 10y ago
Turning to fat doesn't mean mass will come out of nothing
6.
by dabadoo 10y ago
Yes my mistake. 13k calories is roughly 4 pounds. >Hormones play an important role in how much fat is stored and how much your metabolism burns. And the type of food you eat can affect your hormones. It doesn't matter if 100% of the
7.
by dabadoo 10y ago
Kcals in/out is literally the conservation of mass. Increasing fat synthesis doesn't mean your body can magically make up mass.
8.
by dabadoo 10y ago
Bioavailability of calories isn't relevant here. There literally is not enough energy in that amount of sugar. Why does it matter if 80% of the available calories is absorbed of 90%? "Insulin levels - when insulin levels are high
9.
by dabadoo 10y ago
Weight gain is impossible without the necessary amount of calories. It is the simple law of conservation of mass/energy. 160 calories * 21 days = 3360 calories. This is enough to gain about 1 pound of weight, not 19.
10.
by dabadoo 10y ago
It is a matter of calories in calories out. He didn't just increase his concentration of fat, he straight up gained 8.5 kilograms of mass.
11.
by dabadoo 10y ago
The math does not add up. 40 grams of sugar does not have enough calories for you to gain 3 kilograms in 12 days, or 8.5 kilograms in 21 days. Moreover, if he ate as much as the average American eats, how is it that the average American has