d_silin

6 ms·

1.
by d_silin 7d ago
Why don't they use their AI solutions for software development?
2.
by d_silin 7d ago
This is the question I don't have a satisfactory answer for. But neither does Sam and Dario.
3.
by d_silin 8d ago
...absolutely nothing will change short-term. Long-term, you still have to pay all the bills, but you won't be able to find a job (all taken by AIs).
4.
by d_silin 8d ago
The actual solution link https://t.co/tz1shoCZZo
5.
by d_silin 13d ago
Current AIs are closer to bottle rockets than to the Starship on the intelligence scale. Some property damage already happened, but you can't master the art of rocketry without trial and error.
6.
by d_silin 13d ago
Market bubble will pop, not the first time and not the last, most likely after OpenAI and Anthropic IPOs.
7.
by d_silin 13d ago
To add a bit more constructive feedback, think of the "AI cornucopia" and "Superintelligence destroys humanity" as opposite ends of all possible outcomes distribution (low probability event). The most likely one is the &
8.
by d_silin 13d ago
A debate between grossly incompetent against grossly immoral, honestly. You should ignore anything LessWrong or OpenAI says and do your own research.
9.
by d_silin 20d ago
Intel is also interested in this market. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/content-details/9234...
10.
by d_silin 26d ago
But humans can be. I am sure Sam Altman wants to avoid serving multiple decades in American prison for felonies his AI did.
11.
by d_silin 26d ago
While I am not 100% opposed to this idea, it should come with liability to the provider AND its error rate be better than best human doctors.
12.
by d_silin 27d ago
I suspect that you can definitely use planned economy tools down to a certain scale and then let the markets sort the rest. At some level, Indian and Chinese economies have their development centrally planned, not just financially regulated
13.
by d_silin 28d ago
Neat. Note that battery life is reasonably good (2 years) even with Bluetooth sync feature.
14.
by d_silin 1mo ago
I followed the story and he absolutely did, in multiple instances.
15.
by d_silin 1mo ago
This is deeply unsatisfying answer.
16.
by d_silin 1mo ago
The question to Sam and Dario would be: if the thing you are building is going do displace humanity, then why are you building it?
17.
by d_silin 1mo ago
Low quality bait. If humans would be able to settle Mars and asteroid belt, there is no limit to how far you can expand onwards.
18.
by d_silin 1mo ago
That's a cost, though. And in today's world, companies rather burn millions on AI than train their own labour.
19.
by d_silin 1mo ago
I sense a certain contradiction? If majority of students are just not very good at self-studying methods, then they don't scale well. Mediocre student that sits through lectures, does the homework and submits assignment on due dates wi
20.
by d_silin 1mo ago
Self-directed studying doesn't scale. To produce thousands of new graduates per year you need industrial-scale methods - schools and colleges.
21.
by d_silin 1mo ago
I can teach symbolic math effectively using clay tablet and reed pen today . Numerical methods, however, would require at least minimal computing hardware. I think there should be a guiding principle of using the least amount of tech in te
22.
by d_silin 1mo ago
Ha! Steroids give you muscle mass without lifting, believe it or not. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199607043350101 Of course, side effects are a different story.
23.
by d_silin 1mo ago
I had iPads and Apple Pencils - but nothing beats the pleasure of ink pen on paper.
24.
by d_silin 1mo ago
LLMs are like anabolic steroids for the brain. Surely you can do more with them, but you are better without them. Access to them should be restricted, especially for untrained minds.
25.
by d_silin 1mo ago
And for the good reason. I have yet to see 1 (one) reason how giving infinite cheat machine to students is of any benefit to them. The secret to mastery remained unchanged for a thousand years: books, lectures and homework. All of this can
26.
by d_silin 1mo ago
High-quality (higher carbon) steel required for frame, chain and gears was not abundant enough and cheap enough until late XIX century.
27.
by d_silin 2mo ago
Local models running on Apple hardware are definitely a thing, a low-hanging fruit they are harvesting right now while every pure-play AI company is losing money.
28.
by d_silin 2mo ago
Reminds me of LTCM fund story (very smart people X highly leveraged portfolio = a perfect recipe for massive losses on black swan day)
29.
Leopold Aschenbrenner's Situational Awareness seeks capital after AI rout(ft.com)
3 points by d_silin 2mo ago|0 comments
30.
by d_silin 2mo ago
Article gave me an idea that Indus Valley seals were baker's stamps - that's why the imprinted goods were never found (eaten!).

More ›