dS0rrow

8 ms·

1.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
Cremieux is the pen name of reddit user u/TrannyPornO just read some of his comments.
2.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
Some form of prediction being used by the higher-level neurons doesn't make the brain a prediction engine.
3.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
> Have you heard of information theory? > Your argument against deriving meaning from statistics completely ignores that the brain also works this way. The brain is not predicting it's compressing.
4.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
This talk by Feynman is slightly related: https://youtu.be/obCjODeoLVw
5.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
> I understand that you may believe your ability to think is magic. Nobody said that. I am sick of the false dichotomy of being given only two choices: a) It's magic b) It's akin to our latest discovery
6.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
If it's continious then nothing is emerging and it can be explained by the sum of it's sub-systems.
7.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
> Of course it's just statistics, but so are we. Where is this coming from?
8.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
https://libraryofbabel.info/bookmark.cgi?i.jcpzd341
9.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
> Do you see? Emergence can only be discontinuous.
10.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
Thanks for sharing! In the 1st example ["computer nerds", "hackernews", "geeky", "computer tones"] seem to make the result sound more like an old-school RPG soundtrack rather than a song.
11.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
I still cant believe people voluntarily scanned their fucking eyeballs!
12.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
You think privacy has no value?
13.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
> Really, has there been a backlash against me? I hadn't noticed any change. I actually worry a lot that as I get "popular" I'll be able to get away with saying stupider stuff than I would have dared say before. This
14.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
I blame Substack.
15.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
> society and the economy like never before. This process carries enormous risks and opportunities, which are currently basically... ignored (well, the risk side) What risks are you talking about here?
16.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
Not achievable with current methods != Impossible
17.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
I dont think its fair to say that LLMs have passed the Turing test.
18.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
From the wikipedia page you linked: Isaac Asimov's Corollary to Clarke's First Law: "When, however, the lay public rallies round an idea that is denounced by distinguished but elderly scientists and supports that idea with gr
19.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
> This thread's article was written by a high-IQ intelligent author. Does he also have a Mensa membership?
20.
Giraffes make decisions based on statistical information(nature.com)
3 points by dS0rrow 3y ago|0 comments
21.
Noam Chomsky Speaks on What ChatGPT Is Good For(commondreams.org)
3 points by dS0rrow 3y ago|0 comments
22.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
If not convincing what argument for and against do you think is the strongest?
23.
Artificial General Intelligence and the bird brains of Silicon Valley(softwarecrisis.dev)
3 points by dS0rrow 3y ago|0 comments
24.
by dS0rrow 3y ago
https://github.com/monero-project/research-lab/raw/master/wh...
25.
Plato's Problem(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by dS0rrow 3y ago|0 comments
26.
by dS0rrow 4y ago
hn is not pleased ofc.
27.
by dS0rrow 4y ago
do you mind sharing why you consider handmade hero a con ?
28.
As inflation heats up, 64% of Americans are now living paycheck to paycheck(cnbc.com)
27 points by dS0rrow 5y ago|4 comments
29.
Intelligence alone doesn't cut it(mental-reverb.com)
1 points by dS0rrow 5y ago|1 comments
30.
by dS0rrow 5y ago
https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/5777

More ›